Re: the "No Scores in Headers" Policy



On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 09:51:23 +0200, "Futbolmetrix"
<futbolmetrix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


"Futbolmetrix" <futbolmetrix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ds4bqv$l47$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Call for Discussion (isn't this the way things are done in Usenet?): the
"No Scores in Header" policy

I think it's time that we reevaluate our "No Scores in Header" policy. We
should discuss the matter, draft a potential amendment to the FAQ, and put
it to a vote. Maybe in the end we'll decide to keep things as they are
now, but at least it will be a decision of the current members and
contributors to RSS, instead of a blind worship to a norm that was drafted
15 years ago, under completely different circumstances.

Based on the responses to this thread, there seems to be a solid majority
(about 2 to 1) in favor of keeping things as they are now. There could very
well be a silent majority who is in favor of change, but if they don't speak
up now, I'll let the initiative die off without even putting it to a vote.

In any case, it's a good thing that we opened this up for discussion.

Either way would do me.

We might as well. Every time the doctor starts a thread you know
Arsenal's had a good day anyway, who cares if it's in the header or
not, it's still a spoiler.

--
I am death, not taxes. I turn up only once.
--
Terry Pratchett, Feet of Clay.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Unable to resolve MX using nslookup
    ... I couldn't get this to work using a local policy on my PC without manually ... When I manually specify ... >> HEADER: ... > It looks like the problem is in the DNS suffix search list, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.dns)
  • Re: the "No Scores in Headers" Policy
    ... I think it's time that we reevaluate our "No Scores in Header" policy. ... Based on the responses to this thread, there seems to be a solid majority ... I'll let the initiative die off without even putting it to a vote. ...
    (rec.sport.soccer)
  • Re: Computer-based group policies do not work
    ... >>> Applied Group Policy Objects ... >>> Custom IE Header ... I have users in one OU and machines ... machines that existed in a different OU than the user accounts, ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
  • Re: Are some DDK Header files allowed to be distributed?
    ... Well - I had read somewhere that some MS had a policy on some of the header ... > rather their own opinion. ... >> several DDK include files ...
    (microsoft.public.development.device.drivers)
  • RE: [Full-Disclosure] Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!!
    ... I vote for number 1. ... > The subject header is going to change. ... > for Full-Disclosure that relies on headers you will always see in ...
    (Full-Disclosure)