Re: Why are so many RSS posters against healthy if somewhat controversial debate? [+R]
- From: Victoria Barrett <vbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 14:49:02 -0400
On 11 Sep 2005 10:19:10 -0700, "SHUSSBAR" <SHUSSBAR@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>No problem if you don t agree. It s fine with me. As far as love in the
>morning, can we change that to late evening? I am not a morning guy for
>that. but i ll bring coffee and croissant instead :-)
Doh! I'm one of those unusual morning girls...
Come on, not even on a Saturday? :)
--
http://futuremd.blogspot.com/
Katrina Victims Dedicatory Post: http://futuremd.blogspot.com/2005/09/nights-are-worst.html
.
- References:
- Re: Why are so many RSS posters against healthy if somewhat controversial debate?
- From: getreadyforthebeach
- Re: Why are so many RSS posters against healthy if somewhat controversial debate? [+R]
- From: Matthias Mühlich
- Re: Why are so many RSS posters against healthy if somewhat controversial debate? [+R]
- From: Diabolik
- Re: Why are so many RSS posters against healthy if somewhat controversial debate? [+R]
- From: Victoria Barrett
- Re: Why are so many RSS posters against healthy if somewhat controversial debate? [+R]
- From: Victoria Barrett
- Re: Why are so many RSS posters against healthy if somewhat controversial debate?
- Prev by Date: SHOCKING EARTH SHATTERING NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Next by Date: Re: Why are so many RSS posters against healthy if somewhat controversial debate?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why are so many RSS posters against healthy if somewhat controversial debate? [+R]
- Next by thread: Re: Why are so many RSS posters against healthy if somewhat controversial debate? [+R]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|