Re: OT - RIP Ted Kennedy
- From: Brent <the_1aser@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 01:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 1, 9:04 pm, "Ziggy" <larry1...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Brent" <the_1a...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
On Sep 1, 9:30 am, johnmhill <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 1, 9:09 am, Brent <the_1a...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 30, 4:30 pm, johnmhill <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 30, 3:32 pm, Brent <the_1a...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 30, 12:39 pm, johnmhill <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rasmussen is famously right wing and woefully missed on the actual
election results, having the race much closer than it actually was.
That you cite them just shows that you're really only confirming
Just an internet search - like yours. And what is wrong with right
There's quite a lot wrong with using a survey company with a well-
known right wing bias as basis for an objective assessment of Obama's
popularity. Namely, that it's not true.
All the other pollsters are wrong and Rasmussen is on the money,
First of all RCP is a well known Dem supporter news service.
Uh, that's an aggregator of various publicly available polls which
shows Rasmussen as an outlier. The identity of the aggregator is
pretty irrelevant, although it's amusing that you think otherwise - is
RCP changing the data do you think? Selectively displaying data? I
would be interested in any empirical evidence that you can supply in
Rasmussen was reatined by the Dems to do polling in various elections.
Yeah, politicians HATE polling data. They want as little as possible
from as few sources as possible.
thirdly, what the hell does it all matter over 5% diff? Fact is the people
are beginning to see Obama for what he is - a non-achieving, manipulative,
socialist without a spine.
Manipulative AND spineless at the same time! An interesting
- Prev by Date: Re: Disgraceful Cuntabs over the years
- Next by Date: Re: Hendrik Roodt ??
- Previous by thread: Re: OT - RIP Ted Kennedy
- Next by thread: Re: OT - RIP Ted Kennedy