Re: Survey

In message <d1b825fd-fed3-4860-b463-5782ad9a0151@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stex <stex2727@xxxxxxxxx> writes
........... there has been a discussion saying that Kiwis never say we
got beaten by a better team (by Devs). When pointed out that we
actually had both Dunford and myself he went into typical English
gibberish mode and talked *** to wriggle out of it. So after a
discussion like this Uncle Dave comes out and says the English got
beaten cause they played poorly. But what irks is that in the face of
this hypocrisy you still claim to be gracious. By all means call
yourselves gracious its about as true as me calling myself Elvis.

For what its worth hes probably right but dont give us *** when we
say the same. And remember that the AB's have a much better winning
record than England and it it probably true more often than not that
the AB's have played poorly in a loss.

Listen fuckwit, I shall say this in simple terms so you can understand. I am not English. I asked for links to posts where kiwis said that they played well but got beaten by a better team. I still haven't seen one and really doubt I ever will. One of the links you posted said that you thought that the general consensus was fair cop. This is an opinion of opinions given 17 years ago. A link to just one of those opinions would suffice. I can give you links to many that put the loss down to a rigged draw. Did I mention I am not a pom? If you really want me to shut up on the matter as I promised then dish up a link but hurry up, you appear to be the kind of ignoramus that I have no time for, so I imagine you will be in the kf before long. I'm sure it will be no skin off either of our noses.
--
Devs
"Punchdown Pete the old Kroner"
Un autre 4 ans!
.

Loading