Re: Hipkiss for 12
- From: JohnO <johno1234@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:00:11 -0700
On Oct 1, 9:51 am, simon s-b <baitt...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm worried about Mortlock having seen how leaky the Barkley, Tait
axis can be. One try is not really enough to convince me on Faz, so
I'm starting to wonder about Hipkiss at 12. I'd be curious to hear
what Mike and Tim think about that as I know he's played a few there
for the Tigers? Anyone heard anything about JR? If he was fit I'd drop
Lewsey and move Tait to the wing.
I think we can bank on having the majority of possession, so maybe we
should worry more about attack? Thing is, unless we pick Moody and
Rees, we can look forward to being turned over a lot as well.
Who would want to be BA? One would have to say with the number of
players that have simply not been used that he got it all a bit wrong
in the squad selection. If he had his time again do you think he'd
have taken Catty and Lawrence?
Put Farrell in there to deal with Mortlock. He's from league so should
be adept at dealing with Morlock's running style. It's a bonus that
your attack loses nothing by putting him in the centres.
Cheers,
JohnO
.
- References:
- Hipkiss for 12
- From: simon s-b
- Hipkiss for 12
- Prev by Date: Re: Who's Who
- Next by Date: Re: open letter to tv commentary teams
- Previous by thread: Hipkiss for 12
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
