Re: Does Andy have a plan ?
- From: "Ali Day" <Alasdair.Day@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:41:47 +0100
"Sean Byrne" <byrne_sean_spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dt48r9$i11$1$8302bc10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Rowdy wrote:
And so they do, indirectly. If Aus or NZ had won in 2003, we'd now be
in a world in which forwards were picked for their running and handling
alone, and scrums would be a 5-second lean-against-each-other restart,
just as some Australians would still like. Instead, and luckily for
the Greater Good of the Game, England based their win on a dominant
front five and a big, mobile and aggressive back row;
Riiiight... that Neil Back was a giant.
I think alot of people would agree with you there.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does Andy have a plan ?
- From: Brent Hadley
- Re: Does Andy have a plan ?
- From: Sean Byrne
- Re: Does Andy have a plan ?
- References:
- Does Andy have a plan ?
- From: Rowdy
- Re: Does Andy have a plan ?
- From: Uncle Dave
- Re: Does Andy have a plan ?
- From: rick boyd
- Re: Does Andy have a plan ?
- From: Rowdy
- Re: Does Andy have a plan ?
- From: Sean Byrne
- Does Andy have a plan ?
- Prev by Date: Re: So is Australia raping the Pacific, too?
- Next by Date: Re: So is Australia raping the Pacific, too?
- Previous by thread: Re: Does Andy have a plan ?
- Next by thread: Re: Does Andy have a plan ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|