Re: More fuel for the flames

In message <pkvig1tb9nu1m4gsi2ve6k1atcib20iqjg@xxxxxxx>, Charles <charles@xxxxxx> writes
Ah, another Usenet golden oldie: when *you* search (I know, fucking "3 clicks") for personal information and point others in that direction, it's a matter of exposing me for the fraud I am, and providing a public service.

It has clearly happened to you before Charles. I'm not surprised but I haven't done anything remotely like that. I just provided the results of a search of your email address as evidence of what a ponce writes like.

Yet when I reciprocate and do the same by way of retaliation, I become a "stalker" and a "sad man"!!

Well the evidence is there for all to see. You didn't know me from Adam before, now you "know a lot about me" and even know who my employers are. I think that qualifies as stalking. Not that it bothers me too much as there is nothing you could find of any real importance. It does reveal the kind of person you really are though.


Double standards Pete? You really are scraping the barrel old chap!!

Ooh, look at that - another assessment of my posts. Is there ever a point or do you just mark people's posts and then tell them how good you are?

You have definitely got a chip on your shoulder which must be difficult for you considering those with whom you constantly rub shoulders!! ;o) 

Who would that be then?

--
Pete Devlin
[{//////news03//////at\\\\\secondrow/////co\\\\\uk}]
"And the devil in a black dress watches over"
.