Re: Why was Matfield cited?
- From: Bobs <blah@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 21:38:56 +1200
BrentC wrote:
On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:52:38 GMT, "didgerman" <aw990012@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Uncle Bully" <wakeupcall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:42f71753$0$17734$afc38c87@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Walter Mitty" <mitticus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:3lmivtF13cfh4U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_union/international/4128448.stm
SO a tackle was a little late? Big deal. Look what happened to O'Driscoll : two guys tackled him late - picked him up, spun him over and piled his head into the ground : all a part of strong NZ rugby I'm told. Ridiculous.
FFS are you guys still bleating about BOD...
Why not? It was the most blatant act of cheating and cowardice seen this year. Of course, the All Blacks haven't finished retaining their wooden spoon yet, so it could get worse...
Sorry - BOD who?
Some useless Eurotrash chump, Brent. .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why was Matfield cited?
- From: BrentC
- Re: Why was Matfield cited?
- References:
- Why was Matfield cited?
- From: Walter Mitty
- Re: Why was Matfield cited?
- From: Uncle Bully
- Re: Why was Matfield cited?
- From: BrentC
- Why was Matfield cited?
- Prev by Date: Re: How the *** did Matfield get away with that?
- Next by Date: So the boers won - big fucking deal
- Previous by thread: Re: Why was Matfield cited?
- Next by thread: Re: Why was Matfield cited?
- Index(es):
Loading