Re: Fin shapes
- From: RMTT <rmtt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:21:21 +0100
Ad Brandt wrote:
Just thought of a reason why you want rocker on a shell's bow: when you move towards the bows during your stroke, the CG moves forward, the bows move down into the water. However, a bow with rocker will increase submerged volume forward, and therefore pitch less.J Flory wrote:
- stability - a less stable hull may require a skeg with a greater stabilizing effect on lateral roll, again depending on the designer's expectation of the users' skill levels - the hull's intrinsic tracking ability - a hull with a deeper bow (Filippi, Hudson, Empacher) may naturally track straighter than one with more rocker (van Dusen, Resolute) and hence a smaller skeg may
Slightly off-topic, but now that you mention hull shape, I'd like to ask this question:
what's the advantage of rocker, ie the bow coming out of the water for something like half a metre of length when the rower is in the catch position? This half metre seems useless at that point and thus dead weight, and just before the catch when the boat speed is at its maximum, you probably need all the waterline length you could get! Isn't that the reason that modern sailing yachts have completely abandoned rocker and have these straight, perpendicular bows?
~Ad
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fin shapes
- From: Carl Douglas
- Re: Fin shapes
- From: Nick Suess
- Re: Fin shapes
- References:
- Re: Fin shapes
- From: J Flory
- Re: Fin shapes
- From: Ad Brandt
- Re: Fin shapes
- Prev by Date: Re: Fin shapes
- Next by Date: RSR Reader Survey Results
- Previous by thread: Re: Fin shapes
- Next by thread: Re: Fin shapes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|