Re: OK, somebody explain this to me ...

On Jan 31, 2:52 pm, "SyVyN11" <robhorine...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"trijcomm" <trijc...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:e505a679-070d-4714-bfde-2b0e87dab9d3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

... Limbaugh, Hannity and other analysts describe Huckabee as a
liberal in the Republican Party -- yet they claim that Huckabee is
taking conservative votes from Romney. First of all, that doesn't make
any sense. How can a "liberal" take conservative voters away from a so-
called conservative? Secondlyl, Huckabee kicked Romney's *** in Iowa
and SC. The only neutral state that he lost to Romney was Fla. since
both Mich. and NH are both basically home turf for Romney. So if we
are to agree with the analysts, then Romney should be the one who
drops out since he is taking votes away from Huckabee. Finally, if
Huckabee dropped out, then does anybody really believe he would
endorse Romney over McCain? If Huckabee drops out and if he endorses
anyone, it will be McCain.

Since Huckabee is a evangelical, he would be taking conservative votes meant
for Romney.

Yes, that I understand. But it seems to me that it takes a
conservative to take voters from a conservative. One way or another,
the analysis is faulty.
.

Quantcast