Re: When is the GOP gay debate?


"rwa2play, The Northern Lariat" <rwa2play@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:vNIvi.63$LX2.35@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
FunkyM wrote:
On Aug 12, 1:41 pm, "Yes, THE John Henry" <pfft@!yeah.right> wrote:

"Torrey M. Spears" <nwophoe...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote innews:1186937531.214399.231180@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:






On Aug 12, 10:53 am, "Lord Gow333, Conservative Fullback!"
<lord...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"rwa2play, The Northern Lariat" <rwa2p...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
messagenews:83kvi.100$2U5.53@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering who the opponent is (The MILLION DOLLAR Champion!), yes.
LG
--

I'm always amazed at how these cats and constantly rip on Fox News for
poor reporting, being a mouthpiece of the Administration, whatever...
And yet it's the same people that are ready to call Conservatives
ignorant and conpsiracy-laden fools for dissing every other media
outlet.
The hypocrisy is staggering sometimes.

Thinking lessons, 101:

When you have one organization that is clearly advocating a particular
position or set of positions, and you have several other organizations
who at least make an attempt to maintain objectivity in reporting, it's
not "hypocricy" to point out the advocacy of the first organization.
It's simply objective fact.

It's unfortunate that so many peopl ehave become so intellectually
crippled by fear and ignorance that anything short of absolute adherence
to the principles of their masters is deemed 'subjective,' 'biased,' or
'unfair.' It is a sad, sad thing that, in today's world and by the
standards that some people, such as yourself, hold, reality does indeed
have a 'liberal bias.'

For the thinking man or woman, this demonstrates the deep cynicism and,
ultimately, the barely-hidden insecurities that sycophants and advocates
such as yourself feel in regards to their rather tenuous hold on reality.

But, it has become part of your survival mechanism to dismiss anything
that does not agree with your masters as 'liberally biased.' Seeing it
as anything BUT that would put you in a position of having to actually
reconsider your positions, and frankly I don't think your mind is now
strong enough - and it may never be - to deal with the fact that you are
being shafted hard by your masters. You're being lied to, manipulated,
controlled through fear - the very definition of terrorism, by the way. You lack the strength of character to face the fact that you've been
duped and used, and so instead of facing that harsh reality, you continue
to cheerlead and blindly support your masters, looking out from your
handcart at the scorched, blackened landscape and proclaiming it to be
natural beauty given by whatever you call God, when in reality, you're
looking at the foothills of Hell.

Maybe someday, TMS, you and your ilk will be left with no choice but to
face the fact that you've been sold a bill of goods. Your heroes have
failed you; your so-called leaders are leading you only to perdition. I
hope, for your sake, that when that realization finally sinks in, you can
find the strength to simply admit you were wrong, and then put your
reasonably intelligent mind to work on correcting your error.

Why for your sake?

Because when the game's over and you have to face yourself without masks,
games, and lies, your conscience will be far more merciless in its
evaluation of your actions than I possibly could be.

Good luck, son. You're going to need it.


Now THAT's a good ol' JH post!




Is it just me or has RSPW undergone a renaissance of sorts with John returning?

It's just you.

Same old partisan bull***. More words.

LG (at least to the point)
--
The shining beacon of truth in a newsgroup full of liberals. - rafiki

.

Loading