Re: hahaha, Dems had to add a Minimum Wage increase
- From: "Lord Gow333, Conservative Fullback!" <lordgow@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 15:11:48 -0400
"That Don Guy" <del_grande_news@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:25mg53hhg0m7scv5oj00roi5kdlc9bscdo@xxxxxxxxxx
Killfile Victim #847238 wrote:
WEHT the Line-Item Veto?
It was declared unconstitutional in 1998, in Clinton v. New York:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/97-1374.ZS.html
Five of the justices (Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsberg, Thomas) who
formed the majority opinion are still on the court, so there's little
chance of this changing any time soon sort of a Constitutional
amendment, and that's about as likely as the amendment requested by
Charles Schumer's daughter to legalize Napster.
On one hand I can see it being unconstitutional, but on the other hand I bet it would trim a lot of budget fat.
Oh well...
LG
--
Failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently. - Henry Ford
.
- References:
- hahaha, W is signing a Minimum Wage increase
- From: the Bede
- Re: hahaha, Dems had to add a Minimum Wage increase
- From: Lord Gow333, Conservative Fullback!
- Re: hahaha, Dems had to add a Minimum Wage increase
- From: Killfile Victim #847238
- Re: hahaha, Dems had to add a Minimum Wage increase
- From: That Don Guy
- hahaha, W is signing a Minimum Wage increase
- Prev by Date: Re: Let's Be Honest About: Dink's manlove for Chad
- Next by Date: Re: (Hot Dog Eating) The results:
- Previous by thread: Re: hahaha, Dems had to add a Minimum Wage increase
- Next by thread: AnnCoulter speaks
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|