Re: (OT) This has to 0wn!

FUNNY THING I've noticed, when one ANSWERS & CONFRONTS a liEberal's
bigoted lies with truth, they can't HANDLE it. SUDDENLY they all seem
to fall SILENT & run away.


WHAT is the term?

......Oh, YES. I BELIEVE it is, "Pvvn3d".







rwa2play, The Northern Lariat wrote:
Braves give boot to conservative group at 'Faith Day': http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/>>story?id=2547167

Couldn't have happened to a nicer cockholster. 0wned biatch!





So, you are saying, as a liEberal, you do NOT support the right of a
group whose political philosophies you disagree with to peacefully
attend a public event?


Then I'm sure you would not mind if an organization banned a
LIEBERAL-leaning group to attend THEIR events.


Or would that be DIFFERENT?

--
CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

--

Are you saying that you support the Braves' violating the groups' 1st
Amendment right to peaceful assembly?


Are you saying that you support the Braves' violating the groups' 1st
Amendment right to free exercise of religious beliefs?


Have you ever heard of Skokie?

In the 1970's, a neo-Nazi group wanted to have a public march in this
town, which ha a heavily Jewish population (I even REMEMBER it from my
teenage years). Needless to say, they were banned from doing so. The
neo-Nazis took the case to court (to rub it in, they hired a Jewish
attorney). Their arguement was that, in America, they had the right to
march wherever they chose, as long as it was peaceful, and the fact
that a majority of people found it repugnant still didn't TAKE away
their right to peacefully marching in a 'parade'. The court upheld
their right to march (and it may surprise you to hear, that, as a Jew,
I AGREED with that decision, that the neo-Nazis HAD the right to
march). The arguement WAS: "When we ban expression just because we
disagree with it, we BECOME like the Nazis".

The neo-Nazis marched in Skokie. And people were SO repulsed by thir
display, it pretty much destroyed whatever little credibility they had.

So I guess you are saying you do NOT support the U.S. Constitution. Or
would it be more correct to say you only support it when it benefits
YOUR political side\gives your side an advantage?

Do you say that free speech\right of peaceful assembly only applies if
it's a group YOU agree with? Any group you disagree with (conservative
groups, or groups like this group the Braves essentially 'banned') may
be banned\prevented from exercising their right of assembly since you
disapprove of them?

So that means YOU agree with the methods of the Nazis?

(and NO, this is NOT Godwinned. It is a comparison of how both groups
in question want to ban viewpoints\expression they disagree with.)


See, it sounds to ME like this groups' constitutional & civil rights
were violated. But I guess, if they supported abortion & welfare &
marched out onto the field carrying placards & signs reading, "UPHOLD A
WOMAN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE!!!" or "IMPEACH BUSH!!!", THAT would be
perfectly all right. Because, after all, they're LIEBERALS.


--





$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$


"You pity the fool because you don't want to beat up the fool......If
you pity him you won't have to beat him up."


Mr. T, on pitying da foos, to reporter Kevin Thompson, Palm Beach Post,
July 15, 2006. P. 7D


$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

.