Re: Why didn't the tsunami victims loot and go crazy?



On 5 Sep 2005 09:14:10 -0700, jslater@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>
>
> The fact of the matter is this: When you
>> have a high cat 4 or cat five storm barrelling down on a city below sea
>> level and surrounded by water protected only by levees, you are in
>> trouble and it doesn't matter how much money you throw at the levees.
>> It's really that simple.
>
>Sure. It's trouble. The levees could have been made stronger, but
>it's trouble. But I'm not blaming Bush for the fact that there was
>"trouble." I'm blaming for his ineffective response in the first few
>days that made things worse. And so is most of American, including
>quite a few Republicans and conservatives.


He got bad info from Nagin and Fema..
>
>By the way, what do you think of the Bush admin. planting the lying
>spin that Landrieau didn't declare a state of emergency? Easily
>disproven and all, but shows the Bush admin. realizes about how this is
>being perceived -- and their willingness to lie to try to avoid
>responsibility.--Joe (n.j.) [mWo]


too bad its been proven. But keep spinning.
.