Re: New gun question

Jeff Goslin wrote: 

My suggestion is to not waste your money getting different guns.  Seriously.

If your budget is ONLY $300 max apiece, the jump in performance of a $300
gun vs a $100-$150 gun is not terribly noticable, and, as such, it would
MOSTLY be a waste of money, from a performance standpoint.  Have your boys
hang on to their guns a little while longer, pinch some pennies, and go for
a REAL performance upgrade, which would probably be in the $500-$700 range
for each gun.

Personally, I don't see the need for truly fancy guns that are up that high
at all, but if you ARE going to make the move, there's very little point in
going just one step up in the technology ladder.


Now, I have a question for you. What guns are you referring to?
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The case for gun control
    ... "After the introduction of gun laws, ... "Downward trend evident in ALL homicides." ... money could have been used to save thousands of lives if spent ... I'm stil waiting for evidence of this. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: OT: 2nd Amendment case
    ... keep it out of the Supreme Court, by lobbying to pass a modification to ... Second Amendment," top liberal scholars have been moving toward the ... How much money do you think they can draw over, ... Confessions of a Gun Lobbyist_ ...
    (rec.crafts.metalworking)
  • Re: For Society: mens issues
    ... Gun rights. ... Legalized prostitution. ... That's where the big money is at. ...
    (soc.men)
  • Re: A Model, American Firearms Policy (Long)
    ... But I reject the idea that the protection of individual rights should ... owned by someone with enough money. ... When there are few regulations on firearms, ... And you're wrong about the gun collection part of it. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Gun Law
    ... the money I was carrying to the bank. ... and your gun. ... It was a straight shot from my front door up the street to the bank. ... I meant shoot, obviously. ...
    (misc.writing)