Re: note to rec.sport.paintball readers

>> See my little tirade on women in the military above. I think the same
>> thing should go for gays, lesbians, and bisexuals who want to serve.
>
>Hell, if gays want to serve, and they can handle it, I say "knock yourselves
>out". I don't know WHY you would CHOOSE to subject yourself to the
>***-hating-est group of guys the world has to offer, but if that's your cup
>of tea, go for it.
>
>> putting them into me. If you are a true professional, you'll concern
>> yourself with getting the job done, not with how your peers amuse
>> themselves outside of work.
>
>See above. From what I gather, that's not the problem.

I agree with most what you say but when it comes to gays or lesbians
who are already demonstrating confusion. I would rather them not be
that close to me or even in the same barracks.

Do not get me wrong. One of the units I was in was a detachment at a
remote station and we shared the same bathroom/showers. The showers
were of a bay type scenario with the showerheads mounted on the walls
and a center pod. There was a flip sign on the door policy. Sometimes
it was used, sometimes not. It depended on how tired everyone was or
how late it was. I did not mind the opposite sex in the showers at
the same time most of the time (there was one out of six that was not
that good looking). However if there were a gay or lesbian present I
am sure that would of changed the policy or attitudes. They would of
had to reword the fraternization rules also.

I believe the "No Hear or See it" rule in the military should be
changed back to sexual confusion not allowed. After all, if someone
has already demonstrated confusion in their sexuality and cannot go by
how they were put on this earth, who is to say they will not get
confused during any type of stress situation or confrontation.
.