Re: Old topics
- From: "The_Giz" <The_Giz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 00:24:46 GMT
>
> "R" <rgere70_4@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1133450086.494375.121790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> George, in the off seasone when that pavesi engine needs a tune up, do
>> this, calculate the KE of the piston @ 14,000 rpm using this formula K
>> =1/2mv^2, then calculate the KE of the flywheel using this formula K =
>> 1/2m^2r^2w and see how close these two values are to each other.
>>
>> R
>>
Oh.. the poor little grasshopper. Grasping at the straws of ignorance....
not realizing that just because you can type a big word.... it doesn't mean
you know what it is or how to properly use it in a sentence.
News flash for the befuddled one. When a traditional ICE is running at
14,000 RPM the kinetic energy of the piston at TDC and BDC is *very* hard to
calculate. It's um... er.... oh.... EXACTLY ZERO. And.... if a traditional
ICE is running at a steady 14,000 RPM the net stored kinetic energy over one
cycle is also *very* hard to calculate. It's um... er.... oh.... EXACTLY
ZERO.
Gee.... how does that compare to the kinetic energy of the flywheel???? I
think there is an um.. er... oh... INFINITE ratio.. eh?
And... when the piston goes from BDC (zero kinetic energy) to its max piston
speed (and therefore its max kinetic energy)... it does so in the absence of
an active combustion process. My oh my oh my.... where oh where does that
kinetic energy come from? Prichard is going to guess (and state his answer
like a FACT).. and he's going to guess WRONG. But ain't that always the
case.
Giz
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Old topics
- From: R
- Re: Old topics
- References:
- Re: Old topics
- From: Mr. HPT
- Re: Old topics
- From: R
- Re: Old topics
- From: Mr. HPT
- Re: Old topics
- Prev by Date: Re: ***Google me- Coloramics / Ricky G Classic post ***
- Next by Date: Re: Old topics
- Previous by thread: Re: Old topics
- Next by thread: Re: Old topics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading