Re: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
- From: "The moderator" <no_spam_@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 08:20:15 -0500
"William Clark" <wclark2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:wclark2-2CF391.08200104092009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <bbMnm.128956$sC1.50048@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"gray asphalt" <dontwrite@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Howard Brazee" <howard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ar7u95tu73u6hegjods8csud55cd581hg1@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 17:28:49 -0700 (PDT), Dinosaur_Sr
<frostback2002@xxxxxxx> wrote:
The Death Panel thing is a good one to work on though, because anyone
who says they aren't going to be part of the system is lying. They
have to be there; someone has to allocate resources; you can't just
give everyone top quality care; we can't afford it, and we all know
it.
Current insurance companies allocate which public care they are
willing to pay for with the very old. The "Death Panel" that the
Republicans jumped on is about counseling, more in the way of adding
psychological care than anything else. Sure it is a Liberal thing
(not to mention more money to be spent), but it has nothing to do with
allocating care.
--
"In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found,
than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace
to the legislature, and not to the executive department."
- James Madison
My information is that the counseling on end of
life issues is gone from the proposal and that it
was offered by a Republican in the first place.
Please correct me, if that is not the case.
Please note the deafening silence.
My information is that is was authored by Earl Blumenauer, Democrat from
Oregon.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=33198
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
- From: gray asphalt
- Re: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
- From: Bobby Knight
- Re: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
- References:
- Re: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
- From: Carbon
- Re: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
- From: Dinosaur_Sr
- Re: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
- From: Bobby Knight
- Re: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
- From: Dinosaur_Sr
- Re: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
- From: gray asphalt
- Re: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
- From: William Clark
- Re: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
- Prev by Date: Re: Short shots vs long shots
- Next by Date: Re: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
- Previous by thread: Re: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
- Next by thread: Re: Health care - thanks for reading this +++ : -) +++
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading