Re: Where the *** Was Cheney?

In article <49fb46cf$0$7903$9a6e19ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Carbon <nobrac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, 01 May 2009 12:41:28 -0500, The Moderator wrote:
"Carbon" <nobrac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:49faed21$0$7885$9a6e19ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 01 May 2009 04:50:51 -0500, The Moderator wrote:
"Carbon" <nobrac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:49fa611a$0$7908$9a6e19ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

So, David. Tell me, how do you feel about Dear Leader listening in
on all your electronic communications? Is it still the best thing
ever, like it was with Bush?

Yeah, what is up with that? He campaigned on getting rid of the
eavesdropping program on international communications and now he
supports it.

You must be sick, because you foreigners probably make a lot on
international calls.

Not that you care about facts, but I don't think Obama ever
campaigned against warrantless wiretapping. He said he would put
controls in place so that it would not be abused to the extent that
Bush and his handlers abused it. Even though I trust him more than I
trusted the corrupt Bush Administration, I disagree with him. If it's
unconstitutional, it should not happen, period.

Must suck to be you guys on the right though, because you said last
fall warrantless wiretapping is an essential tool in the WAR! ON!
TERROR!. Now you can't say you hate it.

Suck on these facts.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6fnfVJzZT4

I said Obama campaigned to put controls in place (e.g. FISA) so that
warrantless wiretaps would not be abused to the extent that they were
under the Bush regime. Then in this youtube link Obama said... pretty
much the same thing.

You do understand you just made my point, right? No? Oh well!

i don't think he understands much of anything.
.

Loading