Re: Things I Learned/Misc Thoughts from RSG Ohio 2007 (course management misfire?)

On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:06:15 -0700, The_Professor <dbid@xxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Sep 26, 12:15 pm, Bobby Knight <bkni...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

No, Rob. It's well documented here that you've bragged about being
able to make shots that are far beyond your ability...in fact far
beyond anyone on this news group's ability . Let's not go over that
again.

I have never claimed I could make a shot I cannot make, and the only
contrary "documentation" is the wholly uninformed opinion of people
like you.

You mean anyone that doubts your braggadocios. Wrong again Rob. You
made at least one statement about being able to perform a shot that
only the best of professionals could possibly make. The fact that you
either choose to forget that, or even more unbelievably still claim to
be able to do so, stands for itself.
You've overstated your abilities here in the past, and have been
called on it. Neither Mark, Dalecki nor Annika can be challenged
regarding the scores that they post.


Again, I have never overstated my abilities.

Yes you have. Period. Do I have to go back and get that statement of
yours claiming that you could, at will, make that great shot of
Tiger's? Don't be a liar Rob. That remark of yours was challenged by
a plethora of posters here....and you never convinced anyone but
yourself. You live in a dream world.
and Mark has in factclaimed to be a scratch golfer in the past.
Cite. You can't.
I suspect he would claimso now, at least as per his GHIN index.

You suspect. You assume. You think. You blowhard!

I can challenge anyone I want.
Absolutely. The first amendment gives you the right to say any
foolish thing you want.
A person claims a 0 or better USGA index goes out and shoots 80
something consistently leaves a lot of room for such challenge, as
does a guy claiming to be a 6 doing the same thing, especially whern
the guy claiming to be 6 sets up the 80 something as some sort of
great score. There is no doubt at all that I am much more accurate in
assessing myself as a 12 handicapper than Mark is assesing himself as
0 or Dalecki assesing himself as a 6. Of course people can claim what
they want, but the real scores tell the real story, and they are all
that matters. Six handicappers don't shoot 80 something very often,
and certainly don't brag about it...and 0 handicappers never shoot 80
something, especially on a recreational track...unless maybe they
haven't played for a while, or have one arm tied behind their back.

So you don't take Thor and Pflum's word for the conditions of the day
in question? Selective editing again Rob.

To paraphrase Birdie Bill's question; why the *** do you even deign
to question players that are better than you? The answer lies in your
ego, not theirs. Again, you make yourself look foolish.
.