Re: What Liberal Bias?


"Carbon" <nobrac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46f86528$0$32556$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:16:27 -0500, MnMikew wrote:
"Carbon" <nobrac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46f32510$0$32476$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:55:32 -0500, MnMikew wrote:
"Carbon" <nobrac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46f1b905$0$11043$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:22:43 -0400, Jack Hollis wrote:
On 19 Sep 2007 01:54:12 GMT, Carbon <nobrac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

I think the Times handled this badly. It seems that there is a
plausible explanation that there are "stand by" rates. However,
by the time the Times go this out to AdAge, the whole issue was
out of the news cycle. The Times should have immediately printed
an explanation on its front page. The way it sits now, most
people see the discounted ad as further proof of the NY Times'
liberal bias.

An explanation on the front page? Have you lost your mind? The Post
is a rag. There was no reaction from the Times because there was no
story. Period.

No story? You've got to be kidding. It was all over the news for a
few days.

There is a way around these stupid little pissing matches. It is
through the examination of things called "facts". Facts can be
manifested in any number of ways, in this case through Chris's
definitive discussion of standby advertising rates as practiced by
the Times and other major newspapers.

This begs the question, if the facts so obviously settle the argument
why are all you 23 percenters still bitching? I'll tell you why:
because you're biased.

One of the most biased leftys here calling someone biased, how rich.

You are too biased to evaluate the bias of others.

Ahh I see. Idiot.

I'm always amused when you start calling other people stupid.

As am I when you call others biased.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
    ... explanation of that which is observed (entering the realm of historical ... hard data on and correlate it through the analogical method (inference) ... are called scientific facts if you have nothing better to put forward?" ... criteria of high complexity and high specificity. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Does similarity indicate descent to have occurred?
    ...  There is a good explanation for the data. ... The more 'facts' a theory can explain, ... time and scientists still argue over which is more important wrt ... *anything* one observes and, therefore, is not a testable scientific ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: What Liberal Bias?
    ... plausible explanation that there are "stand by" rates. ... through the examination of things called "facts". ... One of the most biased leftys here calling someone biased, ... I'm always amused when you start calling other people stupid. ...
    (rec.sport.golf)
  • Re: => Physics and facts contradict Bush regime <=
    ... >>> What's your explanation for the entire steel frame of ... >>> WTC7 failing instantly and completely, ... numerous requests for any explanation other than controlled ... while completely avoiding the facts, physics, and science ...
    (misc.fitness.weights)
  • Re: Evolution-16: The evolution of the eye
    ... up with an explanation for a feature. ... If it doesn't conform to known facts, ... Something, ANYTHING can happen for no apparent reason, ... living organisms that react in the presence of light. ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading