Re: Washington continues propaganda barrage against Iran

John B. wrote:
On Aug 28, 11:55 pm, BAR <Screw...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
John B. wrote:
On Aug 28, 6:44 pm, BAR <Screw...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bow Tie wrote:
On Aug 28, 8:42 am, "John B." <johnb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 27, 8:03 pm, Bow Tie <ken_pitt...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 27, 4:14 pm, "William A. T. Clark" <clarknos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
state.edu> wrote:
In article <1188226108.904381.241...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Bow Tie <ken_pitt...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 25, 3:58 pm, "William A. T. Clark" <clarknos...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
state.edu> wrote:
You really think that anyone, save the dedicated neocon, gives any
credibility to that old Scarborough 2003 story? It has had so many holes
poked in it over the years that it looks like Swiss cheese. If that is
the best you can come up with (other than babyish name calling), then
you are struggling even more than I thought.
William Clark- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Scarborough must be lying since he was talking about the left wing
media. Surely they wouldn't boo (in the MSNBC newsroom) the president
as he was giving the state of the union address. It's jut too
unprofessional to be believed. I guess that story about the editorial
staff at the Seattle Times must be a lie too. I wonder why the
director bothered to reprimand them all.
Dan Rather fabricating evidence at CBS News, Koran in the toilet fake
story from Newsweek. It all happened and you can't deny it. You just
start bleating "neo-con" because you are unable to refute it. The
media is biased to the left and those are indicators.
Ken
Well, let's look at it, shall we. First it was not in the newsroom, it
was three or four staffers in a private meeting. None of these were
connected with news opinion content, . . and it goes on from there.
Scarborough changed this story so many times, it doesn't know if it is
coming or going.
Rather was a gullible idiot, and was rightfully removed soon after from
the CBS evening news. You see, I can say that. I have never seen you
repudiate a single right wing idealogue - even Coulter when she implied
that John Edwards was a *** in front of a GoP crowd.
Seems like you should look in the mirror a little harder.
William Clark- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Were they at work at MSNBC or not? I wonder if they were cheering or
booing when Clinton was impeached. If they were at home or in a bar, I
would not have any problem whatsoever. To me, it is troubling that
people who should be producing the news in an even handed way are so
free and easy with their biases. Like I have said before, Cronkite was/
is a hard liberal, but you would never catch him in something like
that at work. Either be in the opinion business (Hannity, OReilly,
Rush, Coulter, Hugh Hewitt, Larry Elder) or the news business. The
line should not be blurred. That is why OpEd is so clearly labeled in
the legacy paper.
What about the cheering over the Rove resignation at the Seattle
Times? It was in an editorial meeting and there were guests attending
that meeting. Resulted in reprimands all around.
You are taking that Coulter remark out of context. She was making a
tangential reference to the situation on that TV show where one star
(ultimately dismissed) referred to another as a ***. He was
required to attend anger management therapy. But, come to think of it,
Edwards is kind of a pretty boy.
What about Larry Craig? Is he a pretty boy, too? Or Mark Foley?
Why should I attack conservatives
when liberals are such easy targets?
Really? The front page of most newspapers today have stories about Al
Gonzales quitting and Larry Craig getting arrested for trying to get a
blow job in an airport men's room. Yur timing really sucks.
But, if you insist, Michael
Savage probably takes it over the line almost every day and it was
correct to remove him from TV over the AIDS remarks he made.
Seems to me that you should not concern yourself with what I do. I can
see that if my country was left to you, we'd be Sweden in about six
months. And overrun by Muslim fanatics in about a year, Comrade.
Ken- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
He should resign like Foley did.
And like Frank did when he got caught running a prostitution ring in his
capitol hill condo, oh wait a minute that was different and perfectly
acceptable to the Dems.
Frank wasn't doing anything of the sort.
Really, it was happening in his Capitol Hill townhouse. How can you
believe that he didn't know what was happening at the place he slept
every night of the week?- Hide quoted text -

Frank rented the basement apt. of his townhouse to a fellow ***, who
used it as a place to have sex for money. Frank said he didn't know
the guy was doing that and when he found out he kicked him out. Maybe
he wasn't telling the truth, but there's no evidence that he knew what
was going on. I once rented a basement apt. in DC townhouse and if I
had been doing something nefarious there, there's no way my landlady
could have known.


That may be what you remember but, the public record is a bit different.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/frenzy/frank.htm

http://www.congressionalbadboys.com/Franks.htm

http://www.noagenda.org/2005/05/frank_and_the_prostitute.php



.