Re: White House spins "The Commander Guy"
- From: "William A. T. Clark" <clarknospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 07:04:48 -0400
In article <0o9f43dijb3op7p7m8irpgg9sdj82i38hg@xxxxxxx>,
Jack Hollis <xsleeper@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2007 13:32:10 -0400, "William A. T. Clark"
<clarknospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Look in the mirror Bill, I'm the only one who has presented any hard
data around here.
You have to be joking. Which "hard evidence" is that? References you
were pointed to? I don't see one single reference that originated with
you. If you have one, please remind us all - we are waiting.
William Clark
We have the 1962 study, which you yourself posted, the MENSA study and
the graph that you posted. That's the true test of science --
replication.
The graph shows a scatter anywhere between 110 and 130. The true test of
science is to consider all data, and that scatter graph has more data
points than anything else.
William Clark
.
- References:
- Re: White House spins "The Commander Guy"
- From: William A. T. Clark
- Re: White House spins "The Commander Guy"
- From: Jack Hollis
- Re: White House spins "The Commander Guy"
- From: William A. T. Clark
- Re: White House spins "The Commander Guy"
- From: AKA gray asphalt
- Re: White House spins "The Commander Guy"
- From: Howard Brazee
- Re: White House spins "The Commander Guy"
- From: William A. T. Clark
- Re: White House spins "The Commander Guy"
- From: Jack Hollis
- Re: White House spins "The Commander Guy"
- From: William A. T. Clark
- Re: White House spins "The Commander Guy"
- From: Jack Hollis
- Re: White House spins "The Commander Guy"
- Prev by Date: Re: White House spins "The Commander Guy"
- Next by Date: Re: White House spins "The Commander Guy"
- Previous by thread: Re: White House spins "The Commander Guy"
- Next by thread: Re: White House spins "The Commander Guy"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading