Re: What's Really Important.
- From: Jack Hollis <xsleeper@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:13:46 -0400
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:58:40 -0400, "William A. T. Clark"
<clark.31@xxxxxxx> wrote:
The real problem is you can't cite your sources.
The dogs bark and the caravan passes by.
Otto
Sources are cited everywhere. If you what Newsweek's - ask them. Also,
go look at the Department of Justice's own published studies - you can
get that for free.
William Clark
He's out on a limb and he can't get off it. Bill, all you have to do
is cite the exact DoJ study. Obviously, if it was a source for your
information, you must have the reference. Why is it so difficult to
post a link to it.
Also how about the ATF reference for the percent of households who own
handguns in the US, I haven't seen that yet either. Or did you admit
that the number was not from the ATF but from the 1991 book you cited.
I'm confused.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What's Really Important.
- From: William A. T. Clark
- Re: What's Really Important.
- References:
- Re: What's Really Important.
- From: Jack Hollis
- Re: What's Really Important.
- From: William A. T. Clark
- Re: What's Really Important.
- From: Otto
- Re: What's Really Important.
- From: William A. T. Clark
- Re: What's Really Important.
- From: Otto
- Re: What's Really Important.
- From: William A. T. Clark
- Re: What's Really Important.
- From: Otto
- Re: What's Really Important.
- From: William A. T. Clark
- Re: What's Really Important.
- Prev by Date: Re: What's Really Important.
- Next by Date: Re: What's Really Important.
- Previous by thread: Re: What's Really Important.
- Next by thread: Re: What's Really Important.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|