Re: VJ on 18
- From: Bobby Knight <bknight@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:51:28 -0500
On 10 Jul 2006 14:47:09 -0700, "Ken Meltzer" <commspkmn@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
Bobby Knight wrote:
On 10 Jul 2006 13:56:59 -0700, "Ken Meltzer" <commspkmn@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
Rick wrote:
No comments - I wonder why. The only difference between VJ this week and PM
at the open was that VJ was only trying to hang on to a piece of second
place. Otherwise - they both stunk up the place.
Wouldn't Singh have tied for the lead if he had holed out that second
shot?
Best,
Ken
Not much of a chance with that drive.
bk
Probably none (as the announcers pointed out)! But it was his only
chance to win the tournament. Mickelson had options other than the one
he chose for his second shot at the U.S. Open.
So I don't think the situations were all that similar.
Best,
Ken
I agree, but Rick's statement seemed to be clear that he didn't
intend to deem the situations similar other than neither was well
played.
___,
\o
|
/ \
.
?Someone likes every shot?
bk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: VJ on 18
- From: Ken Meltzer
- Re: VJ on 18
- References:
- VJ on 18
- From: Rick
- Re: VJ on 18
- From: Ken Meltzer
- Re: VJ on 18
- From: Bobby Knight
- Re: VJ on 18
- From: Ken Meltzer
- VJ on 18
- Prev by Date: Re: Attention King of RSG
- Next by Date: Re: VJ on 18
- Previous by thread: Re: VJ on 18
- Next by thread: Re: VJ on 18
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading