Re: Blade vs Cavity back



Tom K wrote:

"Mike Dalecki" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:41md2mF1famb4U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


The adjustability issue is less important than what it once was, as manufacturers are using a softer steel in their cast heads, a version that makes them about as adjustable as the forged clubheads. The PC-III's are like that, for instance.




Any explanation why my forged Titleist forged blades from 20 years ago are much less scratched and worn than my 1 year old forged 804OS Cavity backs? Did they use better steel 20 years ago? Or was that a harder steel? Both are forged... but the 20 year old blades seem so much more impervious to damage.

--Tom


I don't know. I'd guess a harder type of steel, or perhaps you used head covers for a time?

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Dalecki     GCA Accredited Clubmaker      http://clubdoctor.com
RSG-Wisconsin 2005 Pics:   http://dalecki.net/rsgwis2005/pics/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Blade vs Cavity back
    ... > The adjustability issue is less important than what it once was, ... > manufacturers are using a softer steel in their cast heads, ... Any explanation why my forged Titleist forged blades from 20 years ago are ... Did they use better steel 20 years ago? ...
    (rec.sport.golf)
  • Re: Blade vs Cavity back
    ... manufacturers are using a softer steel in their cast heads, a version that makes them about as adjustable as the forged clubheads. ... Forged steel without any heat treatment will be very soft, and post- heat treatment is entirely optional. ...
    (rec.sport.golf)