Re: Thank you Veterans!!!!

In article <va1no1l2dk35ote2afcnjjfpavgdocecnj@xxxxxxx>,
larry <larry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:05:17 -0600, Lloyd Parsons
> <lloydparsons@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >In article <1133214706.603635.220570@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > "Tex" <marktexkoenig@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Lloyd Parsons wrote:
> >> > Based on the information that WE knew he had at the time, only
> >> > Afghanistan and possibly Saudi Arabia should have been on the hit list.
> >> >
> >> > Iraq is PERSONAL to him and you neocons just refuse to believe it.
> >>
> >> Yes, and if you keep repeating that for 3 more years, you'll probably
> >> lose another election.
> >>
> >> Tex
> >
> >Possibly, but what I don't think will win any more elections, or at
> >least for quite awhile, is the neocons such as the bunch in the WH at
> >this time. People are literally sick of this bunch and poll after poll
> >shows it.
>
> But they are even sicker of the alternative-- which is the blatantly
> dishonest congress saying anything to regain power.

Would this be "dishonest" as in Randy Cunningham, or has Karl Rove spun
a new definition of "dishonest" that automatically excludes any GoP
malfeasance?

> >
> >If the Republicans run another similar to Bush, even Kerry could get
> >elected!
> >
> >Hell, even the more responsible Republicans in congress are running away
> >from this bunch as fast as they can, because they know the closer they
> >are to Bush, the less likely they are to get reelected.
> >
> >If you get your news from more places than Newsmax and the like, you'll
> >likely notice the number of indictments and potential indictments are
> >starting to build.
>
> Republicans have been in nearly total power in DC sincer 1994-- except
> for the Clinton episode-- during which nearly the entire top Executive
> Branch left office in disgrace--led by the impeached, disbarred,
> disgraced buffoon who accidently became president. In these nearly
> 12 years with House and Senate majorities there have been a few
> disgraceful cases--of course, but in contrast to the Clinton or the
> Johnson administrations, the Bush team has been squeaky clean.
> Scooter Libby will be vindicated--

Nonsense, simple nonsense. Of course, if you change the House rules to
get at one Speaker, and then find those same rules indicting you, and
try to change them back again, then there will be no transgressions.
It's called abuse of power.

> >
> >This is very sad, this is not what I wanted in my congressmen/women and
> >President. At one time, I thought that maybe Bush could be what he was
> >in Texas, a uniter. But instead, he has helped the forces of division.
> >Aptly aided by the radio yakkers who see those that disagree with this
> >crap all as traitors or almost as bad.
>
> You must admit that Bush has been RUTHLESSLY attacked since he arrived
> in Washington. I believe he really did want to do what he did in
> Texas--where his popularity never went below 70%. And he has tried
> everything to get along-- but been met with the most vicious partisan
> attacks imaginable--and it is now statistically verifiable that the
> media bias has been outrageous. The number of positive to negative
> "news" articles have been 1 to 10. When he does something good, they
> almost completely ignore it-- such as the Iraqi elections, etc. But
> when something is questionable, the media makes it headlines for days
> or weeks. The Abu Grieve prison abuse is a good example. The liberal
> press hammered that for WEEKS, even though their stories were repeated
> around the world on Arab TV--and cost lives of our boys over there.
> Nancy Pelosi, Ted Kennedy, Biden, Rockefeller, etc. etc. do NOT want
> to get along under any circumstances. They just want power back--and
> they don't care what they have to do to win.

Excuse me, I think I am going to have a good cry about poor Dubya.
Perhaps if he had been in any way prepared or fit for the office, this
wouldn't be the case. Oh, well.

William Clark
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Will Bush Cancel The 2008 Election?
    ... The Bush Administration has both the inclination and the power to cancel the 2008 election. ... Those who think this crew will quietly walk away from power are simply not paying attention. ... before the last elections. ... federal government shut down and Bush would have no legal jurisdiction ...
    (misc.survivalism)
  • Evidence That Bush Will Cancel Elections & Declare Martial Law
    ... Evidence That Bush Will Cancel Elections & Declare Martial Law ... A 'national emergency' will provide Bush the raw power he needs to ...
    (alt.gathering.rainbow)
  • Re: Evidence That Bush Will Cancel Elections & Declare Martial Law
    ... A 'national emergency' will provide Bush the raw power he needs to ... cancel the elections and hold on to even greater executive power. ... While the nation escaped an outright declaration of martial law, ...
    (alt.gathering.rainbow)
  • OT - The Meaning of the Gore Speech
    ... by Al Gore in Washington charging President Bush with trampling on the ... president has been alternately vilified, ... Gore is, after all, not an accidental figure in American ... expansion of executive power." ...
    (alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers)
  • Re: OT - The Meaning of the Gore Speech
    ... > by Al Gore in Washington charging President Bush with trampling on the ... > president has been alternately vilified, ... Gore is, after all, not an accidental figure in American ... > expansion of executive power." ...
    (alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers)
Loading