Re: Another rules question.

sfb wrote:
I don't the think the committee is responsible for telling you how to mark the card. The committee does have to provide the card and a marker.


In most competitions the Committee generally 'appoints' the marker by default on acceptance of the marker's signature when the card is handed in. It is implied in acceptance of the marker's signature that the Committee has retrospectively 'appointed' him to act as marker. A Committee will often generalise the appointment of a 'fellow competitor' as marker in the 'Conditions of Competition', without being specific about it. Nevertheless, the Committee is perfectly entitled not to accept a signature from a person not entitled to be a marker.

cheers
david
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Another rules question.
    ... The committee does have to provide the card and a marker. ... >>committee also has ROG defined responsibilities. ...
    (rec.sport.golf)
  • Re: Another rules question.
    ... ROG 6-6a requires the competitorand the marker to sign the card. ... they committee is being somewhat chicken shit as they by your ... My partner and I had by far the best ...
    (rec.sport.golf)
  • Re: Another rules question.
    ... >ROG 6-6a requires the competitorand the marker to sign the card. ... >and your partner signed the two cards as the competitors since each of ... they committee is being somewhat chicken shit as they by your ...
    (rec.sport.golf)
  • Re: So what happened to player who pled insanity?
    ... professional magician who did a magic act for the committee where he ... The ACBL brought in an employee of Bob Hamman's who is a semi- ... OK -- a committee of professional or highly skilled amateur card ... Board of Director's appeals committee was hearing my appeal. ...
    (rec.games.bridge)
  • Re: Rule 33-5
    ... card ..this resulted in some considerable discussion. ... The Committee may request that each competitor record the date ... and his name on his score card. ...
    (uk.sport.golf)