Re: Public health care = public schools?
- From: The BorgMan <me@xxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Aug 2009 16:03:08 GMT
Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote in
news:p8KdnVsS6J9VDRzXnZ2dnUVZ_oJi4p2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:
The BorgMan wrote, On 8/11/09 10:29 AM:
"The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior" <Iamtj4life@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:53d11c7f-4b37-4ea2-a14a-d56fd542e64a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
And I'm wondering if the results will be the same - grinding
mediocrity with private merely having to do "just enough better"
either in reality or perceived quality to justify its existence.
While some public schools exhibit "grinding mediocrity" - the great
majority of public schools are perfectly fine, functional educational
institutions.
This canard that all public schools are hell holes where no one
learns is retarded.
I differ. If our public schools performed as well as
they do in other developed nations,
The great majority of them do.
we as a people
wouldn't be arguing over whether Obama wants to kill
Trig Palin.
Yes we would.
Ask someone from the UK about The Sun.
--
Aaron
.
- References:
- Public health care = public schools?
- From: The Cheesehusker, Trade Warrior
- Re: Public health care = public schools?
- From: The BorgMan
- Re: Public health care = public schools?
- From: Chris Bellomy
- Public health care = public schools?
- Prev by Date: Re: Please Debunk This ObamaCare 'Myth'
- Next by Date: Cut it out, Rogers
- Previous by thread: Re: Public health care = public schools?
- Next by thread: Re: Public health care = public schools?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading