Re: Welcome Back, Kotter.
- From: Con Reeder <constance@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:05:45 -0500
On 2009-06-17, rich hammett <bubbarichau@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Minun olisi pitänyt tietää, olisi pitänyt tietää,
olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, Con Reeder:
On 2009-06-17, rich hammett <bubbarichau@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Minun olisi pitänyt tietää, olisi pitänyt tietää,
olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, Eochaid Buide:
WELCOME BACK, CARTER
Funny, I recognized it as Ann Coulter already at this point. I
kept her valid points here:
[]
Ad-hominem attack with no answer. The usual.
Give me a list of 5 points from that article you would
like addressed:
Sorry, bud. I won't do your homework. You chose to dispute it
with, as I said, an ad-hominem attack and total dismissal. In
other words, no dispute at all.
--
Alas for those who never sing, but die with all their music in them.
-- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Welcome Back, Kotter.
- From: rich hammett
- Re: Welcome Back, Kotter.
- References:
- Re: Welcome Back, Kotter.
- From: rich hammett
- Re: Welcome Back, Kotter.
- From: Con Reeder
- Re: Welcome Back, Kotter.
- From: rich hammett
- Re: Welcome Back, Kotter.
- Prev by Date: Re: Google Wave
- Next by Date: Re: Google Wave
- Previous by thread: Re: Welcome Back, Kotter.
- Next by thread: Re: Welcome Back, Kotter.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading