Re: Well, there goes the possibility of a legit BCS winner ...
- From: "Jefferson N. Glapski" <jeffersonWEARE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2008 19:34:55 -0700
"stephenj" <sjex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ETE_k.40954$kn7.25288@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tonawanda Frankenstein wrote:
When four major conferences all have a one-loss champion,
sorry, the only event that could stir up outrage is if somehow the
computers put texas - not one of those one-loss conference champs, btw -
in the title game over UF.
no one cares about USC and PSU, except the Rose Bowl, which is where they
belong.
Florida was the only one loss team to lose at home, and we're to believe
that they are better than anyone because you say so, or is it because the
same geniuses that ranked half of the teams in the preseason polls that are
currently unranked made that determination.
Elections aren't the way to decide which football team is better.
Just ask the New York Giants, #7 in the NFL BCS standings.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Well, there goes the possibility of a legit BCS winner ...
- From: stephenj
- Re: Well, there goes the possibility of a legit BCS winner ...
- From: Alexander_ The_Great
- Re: Well, there goes the possibility of a legit BCS winner ...
- References:
- Well, there goes the possibility of a legit BCS winner ...
- From: Tonawanda Frankenstein
- Re: Well, there goes the possibility of a legit BCS winner ...
- From: stephenj
- Well, there goes the possibility of a legit BCS winner ...
- Prev by Date: Re: ACC Championship Observation
- Next by Date: Deer Chase Daniels
- Previous by thread: Re: Well, there goes the possibility of a legit BCS winner ...
- Next by thread: Re: Well, there goes the possibility of a legit BCS winner ...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading