Re: Right Wing Radio

On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 14:01:23 -0800 (PST), Jaybyrd wrote...

On Nov 7, 4:53 pm, E. F. Hokie <efho...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 13:42:42 -0800 (PST), Jaybyrd wrote...
On Nov 7, 4:01 pm, E. F. Hokie <efho...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 03:26:54 -0800 (PST), Jaybyrd wrote...
On Nov 6, 10:56 pm, E. F. Hokie <efho...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 19:50:25 -0800 (PST), Jaybyrd wrote...
Hey, I appreciate you making my point for me, Jim.  There are many
people who don't like him, and about the most vile thing you can say
about someone in the news business is that they're *GASP* biased, so out
come the attacks on O'Reilly.

I ain't saying he's Man of the Year, but those who whine and moan about
his supposed right-wing bias are completely and utterly full of crap.
naive or bate.

Yeah, it can't be that we simply disagree, can it Jim?

You tell me Bryan. You're the one that wrote about people being "full
of crap".

Are you identifying yourself as either a whiner or a moaner, Jim?

You can call me what you want.   However it appears that most here
have ID'd you in that category.

Don't you get all snippy with me over this.  You're the one who called
me naive for daring to disagree with you.  I wrote that those who whine
and moan about O'Reillys supposed bias are full of it.  So, if you are
offended by my comment to the point of using it to justify calling me
naive, then you're self-identifying as either a whiner or a moaner.

Either that, or your justification for rudely stating that I'm naive
simply because I disagree with you is unfounded.  So, which is it?


I admit when I'm wrong. But on this you're wrong and I'm correct.

You replied, "naive or bate". Are you suggesting that wasn't referring
to my statement as either being naive or being bait, Jim?

Where did I use the word "naive"? I might as well say that you tried
to insult my family about this. Same amount of truth there.

Utter nonsense. You're trying to have it both ways. You called me
naive because I disagreed with you. When called on the carpet for that,
you responded that I'd started it with the 'utterly full of crap' bit,
'cept for you failed to notice that I narrowed that down to those who
whine and moan about O'Reilly.

Just admit you screwed up and were out of line. It won't hurt.


--
E.F. Hokie

"To those who have fought for it,
freedom has a flavor the protected will never know."
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Right Wing Radio
    ... his supposed right-wing bias are completely and utterly full of crap. ... offended by my comment to the point of using it to justify calling me ... simply because I disagree with you is unfounded. ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: The pros and cons of .NET
    ... >> stand by your original post, we still disagree. ... > in I make sometimes mistakes by the way). ... > embarassing to answer those and you are not able to admit that. ... > You write "you've been the one insulting people in this thread, ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: Maternity of Elizabeth Dale, wife of William Rogers of Lancaster Co., VA ...
    ... Mr. Chipman has said in reference to the posts of others: ... "And you know what dissembling is: it's trying to bury the weakness of your position in a mound of crap." ... You, who admit you don't know enough to comment, have been brushing aside the comments of those who do, and who have been willing to share their expertise with you. ... Surprise, surprise, surprise. ...
    (soc.genealogy.medieval)
  • Re: "Doublethink" And The Neocon Mindset
    ... that if you disagree with them you are a leftist or a terrorist ... sympathizer, or that you don't support the troops, etc. That's crap! ... That's crap, too. ... ran a potent political machine. ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • Re: Sickening Discussion
    ... Derek Lyons wrote: ... Don't hand me any crap about staying on topic. ... disagree that what I said is off topic. ...
    (sci.space.history)
Loading