Re: The really real as in BON-A-FIDE voter fraud
- From: "Randolph M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:47:38 -0400
xyzzy wrote:
On Oct 23, 4:53 pm, "Randolph M. Jones" <rjo...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:xyzzy wrote:On Oct 23, 1:00 pm, "Randolph M. Jones" <rjo...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Voting districts. Anything that can be gerrymandered.E. F. Hokie wrote:borders of what? Counties? Precincts? Lots?On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:10:16 -0500, Chris Bellomy wrote...I'm in favor of a constitutional amendment requiring all electionE. F. Hokie wrote, On 10/23/08 10:57 AM:Oh, no you don't.On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:48:37 -0500, Chris Bellomy wrote...So... you're in favor of more severe gerrymandering every tenE. F. Hokie wrote, On 10/22/08 9:44 PM:...so?On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:43:18 -0700 (PDT), xyzzy wrote...Gerrymanderers ***LOVE*** rules like that.On Oct 22, 9:33 pm, Dan S.It should be, for a minimum of two years before being elected.
<danUNDERscoreGOEShereSLAUGH...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It happens that Edward M. Kennedy formulated :It's not required that he live in the district he represents.Republican and Democrat nominees are on the ballot in TexasThat's nothing. Our Congressman before the one we have now didn't even
despite missing the filing deadline.
--Tedward
live in the district he represented - and he never did to my
understanding
years (and more if you're in Texas)?
It's not a good excuse to leave one thing incorrect because fixing it
will encourage bad actors to act even worse. Gerrymandering is wrong,
stupid, vile, and those responsible for it should be eaten by wolves.
districts to be convex polygons (except for the edges along borders).
But actually I was just kidding...what I really think is that
geography-based voting ought to be viewed as an anachronism in the 21st
century and done away with.
I somewhat agree with you, but the alternatives are things like
proportional representation, which a lot of people consider to be
effete, socialist and european, or even worse, non-transparent. It
would be a tough sell in this county.
Well, I agree that there are problems with traditional proportional representation, where you vote for a party and then the party selects the representatives...because the representatives are not directly accountable to the voters (they are directly accountable to the party leaders). But a preferential voting system would make the representatives directly accountable to the voters, as they are in a geographic system, but would allow voters to organize around whichever issues/geography/organizing principles they desire.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferential_voting
.
- References:
- The really real as in BON-A-FIDE voter fraud
- From: Edward M. Kennedy
- Re: The really real as in BON-A-FIDE voter fraud
- From: Dan S .
- Re: The really real as in BON-A-FIDE voter fraud
- From: xyzzy
- Re: The really real as in BON-A-FIDE voter fraud
- From: E . F . Hokie
- Re: The really real as in BON-A-FIDE voter fraud
- From: Chris Bellomy
- Re: The really real as in BON-A-FIDE voter fraud
- From: E . F . Hokie
- Re: The really real as in BON-A-FIDE voter fraud
- From: Chris Bellomy
- Re: The really real as in BON-A-FIDE voter fraud
- From: E . F . Hokie
- Re: The really real as in BON-A-FIDE voter fraud
- From: Randolph M. Jones
- Re: The really real as in BON-A-FIDE voter fraud
- From: xyzzy
- Re: The really real as in BON-A-FIDE voter fraud
- From: Randolph M. Jones
- Re: The really real as in BON-A-FIDE voter fraud
- From: xyzzy
- The really real as in BON-A-FIDE voter fraud
- Prev by Date: WVU angry! WVU SMASH!!!11!!1!!111!
- Next by Date: Re: Obama's Big Bucks Explained
- Previous by thread: Re: The really real as in BON-A-FIDE voter fraud
- Next by thread: Re: cyberskin dildo review
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|