Re: Now that the post-Palin glee has subsided
- From: "David Loewe, Jr." <dloewe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:21:09 -0500
On 4 Sep 2008 16:13:44 GMT, The BorgMan <me@xxxxxx> wrote:
"David V. Loewe, Jr" <daveloewe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:58:37 GMT, Jim Gysin <jimgysin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Randolph M. Jones sent the following on 9/3/2008 1:07 PM:
David V. Loewe, Jr wrote:
On 3 Sep 2008 16:43:57 GMT, The BorgMan <me@xxxxxx> wrote:
"David Loewe, Jr." <dloewe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2 Sep 2008 16:46:00 GMT, The BorgMan <me@xxxxxx> wrote:
"David V. Loewe, Jr" <daveloewe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:44:19 -0400, "Randolph M. Jones"
<rjones@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
David Loewe, Jr. wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 12:57:15 -0700 (PDT), Huck Kennedy
<tempehuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 29, 11:19 pm, John Rogers <tiger7...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I think they should definitely teach about evolution in gradeIn GRADE SCHOOL?It's basic biology education - along the lines of the food chain,How so?I certainly hope so. It's pretty moronic if they don't.They're teaching evolution in *grade school*?Most grade school teachers I've come across don't fosterAre you afraid of honest debate, Ralph?Huckabee wants to REQUIRE schools to teach creationism...Rong.
Palin does not.
http://tinyurl.com/69uo9x
And in October of 2006, the Anchorage Daily News reported
that Palin said the following about creationism at a debate:
"Teach both. You know, don't be afraid of
information....Healthy debate is so important and it's so
valuable in our schools. I am a proponent of teaching both.
And you know, I say this too as the daughter of a science
teacher. Growing up with being so privileged and blessed to
be given a lot of information on, on both sides of the
subject--creationism and evolution. It's been a healthy
foundation for me. But don't be afraid of information
and let kids debate both sides."
*I* believe in evolution, and *I'm* not afraid of the debate.
"debate" among their students, no matter which side of the
political fence they sit on.
predator-prey relationships, the cycle of how populations balance
with available resources, etc.
Not teaching evolution would be a gap in that basic biology
education - and all of that is something that should be covered in
basic kids life science type classes.
school. It's pretty fundamental. It's a good tool for
understanding an awful lot of what goes on around us, including
biology, environment, anthropology, psychology, etc.
I agree with you and Aaron here, so you may want to start worrying, or
something.
Any of you with children: Are they being taught evolution in *grade
school*? Because we were not when I was in school.
Yep - my kid already covered some of the most basic aspects of it last
year in kindergarten.
I don't believe that.
I suspect now in first grade they'll talk about it a bit more.--
"It is necessary to get behind someone before you can stab
them in the back."
- Sir Humphrey Appleby, "Yes Prime Minister"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Now that the post-Palin glee has subsided
- From: The BorgMan
- Re: Now that the post-Palin glee has subsided
- References:
- Re: Now that the post-Palin glee has subsided
- From: The BorgMan
- Re: Now that the post-Palin glee has subsided
- Prev by Date: Re: Now that the post-Palin glee has subsided
- Next by Date: Re: So, remember...
- Previous by thread: Re: Now that the post-Palin glee has subsided
- Next by thread: Re: Now that the post-Palin glee has subsided
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|