Re: Wesley Clark. vs. McCain
- From: Google Beta User <wanyikuli@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 30, 1:41 pm, Chris Bellomy <ten.wohsdoog@sirhc> wrote:
I pretty much agree, though there's a certain meta going on
here between the campaigns that most people miss. Basically,
it's this: "You wanna wage this war using surrogates, John?
We can play that game. And we can disavow just like you always
do."
That said, I'd sure like to see the Dem nominee just once
say, "Yeah, that's right, you got a problem with it?"
cb
True.
Which is why I hope Obama picks a straight shooter, that's strong in
National security like Clark or Webb because McCain's started coming
across as a little condenscending on National Security, so they should
rattle McCain like Clark just did. A loose cannon is ok, and I'm
surprised by the "controversy" this is one of those cases of trying to
start a story rather than reporting a story. The comments were not
even THAT bad.
They've been much harder hitting jabs from both sides.
.
- References:
- Wesley Clark. vs. McCain
- From: Google Beta User
- Re: Wesley Clark. vs. McCain
- From: Chris Bellomy
- Wesley Clark. vs. McCain
- Prev by Date: Re: Deer RSFC,
- Next by Date: Re: The McMNC for 1984: Brigham Young University
- Previous by thread: Re: Wesley Clark. vs. McCain
- Next by thread: Re: Wesley Clark. vs. McCain
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
