Re: For rwa: Look, Hillary is *still* a scum sucking tool of a politician

Minun olisi pitänyt tietää, olisi pitänyt tietää,
olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, Torrey M. Spears:
... pandering to the New York constituency when her failed
Presidential bid comes to pass - by more wasteful pork spending. If I
were Barry O, I would hammer the snot out of her with this.

- TMS

You've got a lot of anger in you. You've expressed this
bowel-shaking hatred of both OBama and Clinton in the
last hour or two, and I expect you have some similar
feelings for McCain. You really need to relax, or start
a commune in Tejas.

rich

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/clinton-2.3b-in-earmarks-2008-04-28.html

Clinton: $2.3B in earmarks

By Manu Raju and Kevin Bogardus

Posted: 04/28/08 08:08 PM [ET]

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) has requested nearly $2.3 billion
in federal earmarks for 2009, almost three times the largest amount
received by a single senator this year.

The Democratic presidential candidate?s staggering request comes at a
time when Congress remains engaged in a heated debate over spending
federal dollars on parochial projects.

It also has gained traction on the campaign trail. Presumptive GOP
nominee Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), a longtime foe of earmarks, has
called for eliminating what he dubs ?wasteful Washington spending.?
Democratic front-runner Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) has spurned earmarks,
seeking no funds for pet projects in the upcoming fiscal year.

Yet Clinton is continuing to request billions for earmarks, most of
which will go to her home state.

The money is needed for homeland security, emergency response and
health projects throughout New York, according to documents provided
by her office.

The total amount Clinton requested greatly surpasses the $837 million
secured last year by Sen. Thad Cochran of Mississippi, the ranking
Republican on the Appropriations Committee who took home the largest
dollar amount of earmarks in the current fiscal year?s spending bills.
In those bills, Clinton secured $342 million in earmarks.

Clinton?s huge earmark requests have some speculating that the former
first lady is preparing for a soft landing should she lose the
Democratic primary to Obama and refocus her energy on winning a third
Senate term.

Steve Ellis, a vice president at Taxpayers for Common Sense, a group
critical of earmarks, said the amount is not unusual for a senator
hailing from a big state who has long secured pet projects.

?For her to all of a sudden change course would look opportunistic,?
Ellis said.

?There?s a decent chance that she is going to remain the senator from
New York, and she needs to do what she can to stay the senator from
New York.?

Obama has released all the earmark requests he offered since being
elected to the Senate in 2004, which totaled roughly $740 million over
three years. Obama has also criticized Clinton for not disclosing her
requests. Her office would not say how much she requested in previous
years.

The documents outlining her most recent requests, however, are broadly
defined, with few details on precisely where most of the money would
go.

For instance, Clinton asked for an additional $750 million for a
homeland-state grant program and another $125 million for an urban-
area security initiative in the upcoming homeland security
appropriations bill. But it does not say which projects the grants
would pay for.

Clinton?s office justified the requests, saying the money is needed
after a ?staggering? reduction in the Bush administration?s budget
proposal that left states and localities ?ill prepared to prevent
another major terrorist attack.?

In addition, Clinton is asking for grants of up to $400 million for
interoperable emergency communication, $335 million for emergency
planning, $190 million for port security and $225 million for transit
security.

The senator also wants appropriators on the Commerce, Justice,
Science, and Related Agencies subcommittee to add $10 million to
bolster the nation?s emergency 911 network and defense appropriators
to add $3.2 million for a program geared toward transitioning members
of the National Guard to the construction industry.

In the Labor, Health and Human Services and Education funding bill,
Clinton asks for $231 million to go toward monitoring the health of
people affected by the collapse of the World Trade Center.

Philippe Reines, a spokesman for Clinton, said some of the funding for
first responders and homeland security is based on need and risk, so
New York would receive a portion of the money but so would other parts
of the country.

The most specifics the office provided related to her request for the
Military Construction spending bill. In that bill, she wants
appropriators to provide $7 million to complete construction of a
facility at the Air National Guard base in Westhampton Beach, N.Y.,
$6.6 million to construct a fire station in Fort Drum, N.Y., and $8.5
million for a dining facility and community center at a Niagara Falls
Air Reserve base.

The deadline for earmark requests closed Friday, according to
Appropriations Committee aides.

Chairman Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) does not limit requests for earmarks,
but the committee will likely add just a fraction of these earmarks.

Those decisions won?t be made until later this spring or early summer
after both chambers agree on the overall budget limits for the federal
government. Senate rules do not require members to disclose their
requests.

Earmarks take on added importance in the election year, as lawmakers
point to the pet projects to tout their effectiveness in Congress. But
they have been caught in the roiling debate over whether earmarks are
a waste of taxpayer dollars, a debate that has intensified after pet
projects have been linked to corruption cases in Congress.

Each of the three presidential candidates has claimed to be the
candidate of fiscal responsibility.

Clinton, Obama and McCain voted for an amendment, sponsored by Sen.
Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), that would establish a one-year earmark
moratorium. That amendment failed to pass, however, when it came to a
vote in March.

Clinton said she would limit her requests this year to healthcare
resources for victims of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, as well as
for national security and homeland security needs, according to
Reines.

?The funds requested are for critical needs for New York and America,
and are appropriate and necessary,? Reines said.

Last year, Obama took in $91 million while McCain earned nothing
because he did not request any projects, according to Taxpayers for
Common Sense.

--
-to reply, it's hot not warm
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
\ Rich Hammett http://home.hiwaay.net/~rhammett
/ He always pictured himself a libertarian, which to my
\ way of thinking means ``I want the liberty to grow rich
/ and you can have the liberty to starve''. It's easy to
\ believe that no one should depend on society for help
/ when you yourself happen not to need such help.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Which Party Is Blowing Your Tax Dollars.....
    ... Interesting to note whose whining and who is spending? ... Congress' top earmarkers By The Associated Press ... Congress sent to him in a just-passed spending bill and asked his ... fight the 9,800 "special interest" earmarks he said were obtained by ...
    (misc.survivalism)
  • Re: Why Taxes are Going to Have to Go Up
    ... Congress will meaningfully and significantly cut down its spending? ... Talking about earmarks is like talking about a teenager who borrows 10 ... Starbucks will buy you a cup of coffee. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Why Taxes are Going to Have to Go Up
    ... Congress will meaningfully and significantly cut down its spending? ... Talking about earmarks is like talking about a teenager who borrows 10 ... Starbucks will buy you a cup of coffee. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Bushs Very Good Year
    ... reinforced with news of the best consumer spending in two years. ... the alternative minimum tax. ... "Another thing that's not responsible is the number of earmarks the ... Republicans must be holier than the pope. ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
  • Re: Why Taxes are Going to Have to Go Up
    ... Congress will meaningfully and significantly cut down its spending? ... Talking about earmarks is like talking about a teenager who borrows 10 ...
    (soc.retirement)