Re: Delegate Math Still Doesn't Work for Clinton
- From: That Don Guy <del_grande_news@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:28:09 -0800
Solnichka Frankenstein wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/29/delegate.counter/index.html
Play with this and tell me in what *reasonable* scenario Clinton
passes Obama, please.
None that I know of - just as I can't find a reasonable scenario where
Obama gets the nomination based on pledged delegates.
"But Superdelegates shouldn't be able to change the result against how
the people voted!"
Er, that's pretty much the sole reason they exist, isn't it?
(I still think Clinton will find a way to (choose one or more of:
strongarm, bribe, charm, threaten) enough of the pre-selected
credentials committee members that the Michigan and Florida delegates
as they stand now will be seated - and she'll find a way to pack the
"uncommitted" Michigan delegates (remember, Obama has zero pledged
Michigan delegates, and never mind how many of the people who voted
for "uncommitted" were "really voting for Obama") to give her just
enough "pledged" delegates to make a superdelegate-based win
"legitimate".)
-- Don
___________________________________________________________
No Agony, No Bragony!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Delegate Math Still Doesn't Work for Clinton
- From: John Rogers
- Re: Delegate Math Still Doesn't Work for Clinton
- References:
- Delegate Math Still Doesn't Work for Clinton
- From: Solnichka Frankenstein
- Delegate Math Still Doesn't Work for Clinton
- Prev by Date: You Know You're Gay
- Next by Date: Re: 9th circuit opinion vacated by SCOTUS
- Previous by thread: Re: Delegate Math Still Doesn't Work for Clinton
- Next by thread: Re: Delegate Math Still Doesn't Work for Clinton
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|