Re: Dirty rotten attorneys!

On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:04:39 -0700, mianderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Trent Woodruff wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:10:25 -0700, mianderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Jul 13, 6:13 pm, rich hammett <bubbaric...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, miander...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

A lot of the info about TB in that article is incorrect......since
it's done by the ajc that doesnt surprise me.

There is very little TB info in that article. Which fact, of the
two or three, is wrong?

in referencing whether or not the plaintiffs contracted TB:
"And that will not be known, not now, not next year, but for many
years in the future."
An exposure in 2007 to TB in a previously uninfected person won't
cause someone who had a negative PPD in 2012 to suddenly have a
positive PPD in 2013 from that exposure in 2007.

You would be wrong...in fact, latent infections do occur.

no.....you don't say? Hint: in non-immunocompressed patients in this
country, the overwhelming majority of intitial TB infections are
latent. It's the potential for reactivation(5-10% lifetime risk) that
is problematic because when someone is suffering from TB symptoms in
this country they are suffering from a reactivation(or occasionally a
re-exposure)

Is that a large-worded version of "You're right, I was wrong"? If
not, you should try again.

How is it
that lawyers and military guys know this but you, a fake medical
student, do not?

because woodruff, the latent infection can still be detected cheaply
and easily......

Lawyers and military guys know this but you, a fake medical student,
do not because the latent infection can still be detected cheaply and
easily? Do you understand basic English, Mike? Are you one of Tom's
illegal immigrants?

so the patients would know if they had been
infected(and would be at risk for later reactivation).

The patient would know this. So then a patient recognizes the moment
they contract a potentially fatal disease? Please get out of the
doctoring business...or open a free clinic, where at least your
patients will get their money's worth.

hence the lawyer's statement(and yours) is incorrect.

Except it wasn't.



....Never think that a handful of committed people can't change the world. In fact, it's the thing that usually has.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT
    ... :> The patient obviously. ... Sheesh. ... :> I realise 'the church' would rather people suffered as much as possible ... asking the question when they are suffering can get you a ...
    (soc.culture.scottish)
  • Re: OT
    ... A problem, then, when the patient is suffering from dementia. ... Torturing a person for as long as possible because of some insane mediaevil ... 'Playing God' indeed! ...
    (soc.culture.scottish)
  • Re: Lawsuit questions need for Lipitor
    ... I didn't mean the patient had to be a tabla rasa when entering ... There are effectively no impediment at all when awards are astronomical. ... science deals in probabilities in ways that lawyers don't. ... Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • Re: OT
    ... It's not exactly a difficult or ethical question is it. ... I realise 'the church' would rather people suffered as much as possible for as long as possible because their fairy tale death-cult character supposedly ... A problem, then, when the patient is suffering from dementia. ...
    (soc.culture.scottish)
  • Re: OT
    ... The patient obviously. ... Sheesh. ... I realise 'the church' would rather people suffered as much as possible ... And jail any religious maniac who tries to prolong any victims suffering for ...
    (soc.culture.scottish)