Re: Dirty rotten attorneys!

On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:10:25 -0700, mianderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Jul 13, 6:13 pm, rich hammett <bubbaric...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, miander...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

A lot of the info about TB in that article is incorrect......since
it's done by the ajc that doesnt surprise me.

There is very little TB info in that article. Which fact, of the
two or three, is wrong?

in referencing whether or not the plaintiffs contracted TB:
"And that will not be known, not now, not next year, but for many
years in the future."
An exposure in 2007 to TB in a previously uninfected person won't
cause someone who had a negative PPD in 2012 to suddenly have a
positive PPD in 2013 from that exposure in 2007.

You would be wrong...in fact, latent infections do occur. How is it
that lawyers and military guys know this but you, a fake medical
student, do not?



....Never think that a handful of committed people can't change the world. In fact, it's the thing that usually has.
.