Re: The wonderful world of students, part 482834

On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:46:55 -0700, mianderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Wikipedia is fine for broad, general knowledge about something, but it
is inappropriate to be sourced in a paper or project because it isn't
authoritative. That is all mihos and kardex were saying.

I was going outside the context of their specific complaints(as after
that many posts just dealt with general wikipedia bashing).........I'd
agree that in a formal research paper *citing* wikipedia would be
sorta sketchy.
In general though I've noticed that a lot of people in certain fields
who bash wikipedia in many cases don't have the level of
knowledge(without consulting another source) that wikipedia has on a
subject they are bashing,

It also has had information about Jon Kerrey's homosexual love affair
and that Michael Jordan played soccer in between his basketball and
baseball careers.

Pretty authoritative, alright.

....Never think that a handful of committed people can't change the world. In fact, it's the thing that usually has.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The wonderful world of students, part 482834
    ... That is all mihos and kardex were saying. ... agree that in a formal research paper *citing* wikipedia would be ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: The wonderful world of students, part 482834
    ... That is all mihos and kardex were saying. ... agree that in a formal research paper *citing* wikipedia would be ... Wikipedia is very useful for information but it cannot be an academic source ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: The wonderful world of students, part 482834
    ... That is all mihos and kardex were saying. ... agree that in a formal research paper *citing* wikipedia would be ... I suspect that you are lying in what you say about lectures. ... they aren't clinicians, so why would they be speaking ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: The wonderful world of students, part 482834
    ... That is all mihos and kardex were saying. ... agree that in a formal research paper *citing* wikipedia would be ... Sometimes clinicians ... I suspect you're using a different definition of clinically relevant ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: The wonderful world of students, part 482834
    ... That is all mihos and kardex were saying. ... agree that in a formal research paper *citing* wikipedia would be ... they aren't clinicians, so why would they be speaking ... Why should a urologist know the physiology of the rest of the body? ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
Quantcast