Re: There is no media bias
- From: rich hammett <bubbarichau@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 04:17:17 -0000
Minun olisi pitänyt tietää, olisi pitänyt tietää,
olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, stephenj:
rich hammett wrote:
Minun olisi pitänyt tietää, olisi pitänyt tietää,
olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, stephenj:
rich hammett wrote:
Minun olisi pitänyt tietää, olisi pitänyt tietää,
olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, stephenj:
rich hammett wrote:
Minun olisi pitänyt tietää, olisi pitänyt tietää,
olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, stephenj:
rich hammett wrote:
Minun olisi pitänyt tietää, olisi pitänyt tietää,
olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, stephenj:
Ralph Kennedy wrote:
John Rogers <tiger7_88@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
http://jewishworldreview.com/michelle/malkin051607.php3
Deliberately recruiting ineligible recruits who
might be detrimental to the Army is a matter of
national security. What's the big deal of someone
advising a girl to not say she's 15 so that she can
spare her boyfriend from going to jail for statutory
rape? Malkin calls that "predatory practices?"
Grow up, Rogers.
very sad that you won't join rogers and malkin in denouncing the
deceptive, illegal practices of that planned parenthood operation.
"deceptive". Heh.
what else can you call what the PP operative did?
Will you admit that you and Michelle Malkin would like laws to force
15 year olds to have a baby when they're pregnant,
why not ask me to admit that i prefer vanilla ice cream to chocolate? it
would be just as relevant to the issue of your sad failure to condemn
the deceptive, illegal actions of that PP operative,
If you are talking about the age thing, they are giving more girls
the chance to rescue their lives.
What else could i be talking about? the PP operative is telling the girl
to lie about her age so that the statutory rapist goes free. this is
appalling by any standard, and is clearly breaking the law.
I'm astonished that you haven't voiced your outrage about it, and have
instead mouthed the cliched platitudes of "if we enforced that law, it
would discourage girls from blah blah blah". The old sad coat hanger
rhetoric.
That's your choice. The other half of "blah blah blah" when I actually
wrote words was that the girls might decide to give birth and mess
up their lives that way.
what you wrote was meely-mouthed excuses for undermining the law.
You need to look at the data for Central American Catholic countries, if you
think that coat hanger abortion are "old sad rhetoric."
Since this is the USA, USA data is relevant. deaths from illegal
abortions had practically disappeared before roe v. wade.
They know that far fewer girls
will come in, if they have to put their boyfriend in jail, and may
even resort to dangerous tactics to do a self-abortion.
and the
disgustingly offensive threatening behavior of the PPLA main office,
which instead of attacking that reporter should have fired the operative
caught on tape, made a public apology, and taken immediate steps to
retrain their personnel.
Many of them would like to allow more girls come in to rescue their lives.
Yes, and that's fine. But the ones that break the law should be fired,
I believe the ones who break the law are customers, and not
technically employees.
and the PPLA should take affirmative steps to end the law breaking, no?
That depends. If they judge that more good will be done by allowing
girls to lie about their age, then they should probably keep allowing
it.
Not letting the girls do that is more of a criminal sentence than
anything the girl deserves.
rich
--
-to reply, it's hot not warm
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
\ Rich Hammett http://home.hiwaay.net/~rhammett
/ --I am sick of the self-absorbed city of New York.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: There is no media bias
- From: stephenj
- Re: There is no media bias
- References:
- There is no media bias
- From: John Rogers
- Re: There is no media bias
- From: Ralph Kennedy
- Re: There is no media bias
- From: stephenj
- Re: There is no media bias
- From: rich hammett
- Re: There is no media bias
- From: stephenj
- Re: There is no media bias
- From: rich hammett
- Re: There is no media bias
- From: stephenj
- Re: There is no media bias
- From: rich hammett
- Re: There is no media bias
- From: stephenj
- Re: There is no media bias
- From: rich hammett
- Re: There is no media bias
- From: stephenj
- There is no media bias
- Prev by Date: Re: After 35 Years...
- Next by Date: Re: 42..
- Previous by thread: Re: There is no media bias
- Next by thread: Re: There is no media bias
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|