Re: lousy High School education
- From: Eagle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (J. Hugh Sullivan)
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:36:11 GMT
On Wed, 16 May 2007 11:38:02 -0400, "Randolph M. Jones"
<rjones@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
On 15 May 2007 11:46:38 -0700, Jaybyrd <jaybyrdbird@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 15, 2:18 pm, mianderso...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On May 15, 2:11 pm, estebanJ <sjar...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Only one-quarter of high school students who take a full set of
college-preparatory courses - four years of English and three each of
mathematics, science and social studies - are well prepared for
college, according to a new study of last year's high school graduates
released today by ACT, the Iowa testing organization.....Those who had
not taken this minimum curriculum fared even worse: only 14 percent
were judged ready for college work in all four subject areas, while 36
percent were not prepared in any."
Having taught high school and having been invited to visit a number of
classes over recent years and invited to discuss WWII a number of
times I am less than impressed with the ability of teachers.
I have not attended a class (admittedly somewhat limited) where I
could not explain something the teacher could not. That shouldn't
happen in his/her subject area since I have been out of college for 57
years.
So your standard is that every teacher should know exactly the same
things as J. Hugh Sullivan plus a little bit more? Curious.
I don't expect to be more knowledgeable in their areas of expertise,
interest or current trivia.
I think math teachers, for example, should be able to answer any math
question I could - and more - because my math knowledge has atrophied
over the years from lack of use. I find that most people can't even
balance their check book to the penny every month - the bank asks if I
need to know my balance when I make a deposit in one of the accounts
(as if they knew what checks are outstanding).
I think English teachers should be able to pronounce and spell words
better than I. I think they should write more clearly and explain
better - it's their area of expertise. People here use words
incorrectly on purpose and that's funny - but not being taught the
difference between lose and loose or there and their is absurd.
Or maybe I have the whole thing wrong - perhaps it's not incompetent
teachers, it's that they have imbeciles for students. Maybe you could
clear that up for me.
I am more impressed with the teachers in the private schools in the
Dallas area than any in public schools.
A college kid at the grocery store yesterday asked my wife whether two
quarts of milk was a better buy than a half gallon. Normally it is but
not yesterday. It is unthinkable to me that even a junior high kid
couldn't figure that out. It speaks poorly of teachers - or students
who get passed regardless. (Did you think I would say
"irregardless"?).
Of course my wife was so flattered at being asked that she forgot to
put the second quart in her cart.
Hugh
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: lousy High School education
- From: Randolph M. Jones
- Re: lousy High School education
- References:
- lousy High School education
- From: estebanJ
- Re: lousy High School education
- From: mianderson79
- Re: lousy High School education
- From: Jaybyrd
- Re: lousy High School education
- From: J. Hugh Sullivan
- Re: lousy High School education
- From: Randolph M. Jones
- lousy High School education
- Prev by Date: Re: Falwell
- Next by Date: Re: lousy High School education
- Previous by thread: Re: lousy High School education
- Next by thread: Re: lousy High School education
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|