Re: Chocolate Jesus
- From: "TimV" <tvanwagoner_yourknickers_@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:18:36 GMT
"Trent Woodruff" <woodruffs@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:850t039brhju684m8sereq03mpopf4lgcv@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 15:20:19 -0000, rich hammett
<bubbarichau@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, John Rogers:
"CNN has chosen to not show the sculpture in respect for
Christianity."
"CNN is not showing the negative caricature of the likeness of Jesus
Christ because the network believes its role is to cover the events
surrounding the display of the art while not unnecessarily adding fuel
to the controversy itself."
Oh... waitaminute. CNN *did* show the sculpture of a naked,
anatomically-correct, Chocolate Jesus. As did ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC,
and Fox.
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... sorry. My mistake. Correct quotes below:
"CNN has chosen to not show the cartoons in respect for Islam."
"CNN is not showing the negative caricatures of the likeness of
Prophet Mohammed because the network believes its role is to cover the
events surrounding the publication of the cartoons while not
unnecessarily adding fuel to the controversy itself."
What do Catholics have against crucifixes?
You seem to be intentionally avoiding the point.
Last time I checked, we as Christians have no prohibitions on displaying the
image of Christ. I see plenty of them each Sunday and Wednesday.
The sculpture may have been in bad taste (har, har), but it wasn't really
offensive to me. The Muhammed cartoons are offensive to an entire religion.
T
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Chocolate Jesus
- From: Trent Woodruff
- Re: Chocolate Jesus
- From: John Rogers
- Re: Chocolate Jesus
- References:
- Chocolate Jesus
- From: John Rogers
- Re: Chocolate Jesus
- From: rich hammett
- Re: Chocolate Jesus
- From: Trent Woodruff
- Chocolate Jesus
- Prev by Date: Re: Heh
- Next by Date: Re: the Geneva Conventions
- Previous by thread: Re: Chocolate Jesus
- Next by thread: Re: Chocolate Jesus
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
