Re: A poll, if you will
- From: Steve Cutchen <maxfaq@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:50:10 -0500
In article <pf2103d2ai76nln2ut3btspetvj6i02s5c@xxxxxxx>, John Rogers
<tiger7_88@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Being that, in my opinion, there is no "right" or "moral" answer to
this conundrum, I would say that is a person chose not to "torture"
and it ended up that the "suspect" had nothing at all to do with the
bombing then, of course, they were "right". But if evidence proves
later that the "suspect" DID have foreknowledge of the bombing, then
the person who chose not to torture and allowed many others to die in
order to maintain his own idea of high-minded ideals, than that person
is very selfish and WRONG.
Unbelievable. That is revisionist history pure and true.
The decision had to be made with the information available. The
correctness of the decision has to be based on how the decision was
made with that information.
.
- References:
- A poll, if you will
- From: Trent Woodruff
- Re: A poll, if you will
- From: John Rogers
- A poll, if you will
- Prev by Date: Re: The more I ponder the Plame affair, the more odd it becomes
- Next by Date: Re: A poll, if you will
- Previous by thread: Re: A poll, if you will
- Next by thread: Re: A poll, if you will
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading