Re: More well-intentioned reporting from the NYT.
- From: The Grand Beckoning <the@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 19:17:10 -0400
On 3 Jul 2006 15:16:46 -0700, "Dan Bretta" <nudan92@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Grand Beckoning wrote:
On 3 Jul 2006 14:15:29 -0700, "Spaceman Spiff"
<mrtobrien@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Grand Beckoning wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 17:38:36 +0000 (UTC), Dave Reid
<ddreid@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Grand Beckoning <the@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:guqga2pjaj7g16mce2irfl380tvfqsv5u7@xxxxxxx:
"There is a lens in the birdhouse at the driveway of Defense Secretary
Donald H. Rumsfeld's home at St. Michaels, Md."
http://tinyurl.com/p3526
Fucking assholes.
This seals it: their reckless reporting is political.
Wow....I'm surprised someone beat Enright to posting the lasted bit
of Faux-Outrage circulating among the RightWingBlowHards.
And damn that Rumsfeld....since it appears that, at least according
to the photographer, he gave permission for those photos.
http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2006/07/what-is-left-of-malkin-
hinderaker-and.html
"As a result, I wrote e-mails yesterday to Linda Spillers (the
photographer) and Peter Kilborn (the reporter) bringing these accusations
to their attention and asking for a response.
Although I haven't heard yet from Kilborn, I received an e-mail from
Spillers this morning, in which she said:
Ironically, photos were taken with Secretary Rumsfeld's permission."
dave
He never gave permission to reveal the camera and its location, as
common sense and decency would mandate that not be done, you dope. The
photos were never the issue, which is why I said "their reckless
REPORTING is political."
Please, it's a picture from the front of the driveway and you can see
the damn lens. They're not giving away anything that is a security
problem. There's always a camera that's tiny and well hidden that
will pick up whoever is trying to sneak by the obvious one, which is
probably right next to an intercom system for his guests.
It's not your call you moron.
Amazing the faux-outrage you righties can muster up over trivial items.
But when a CIA agent working on WMD's in IRAN is outed all you can do
is deny/deflect/deceive.
OH NO THE TERRORISTS WILL NOW KNOW WHERE RUMSFELD'S SECURITY CAMERA IS
LOCATED!!!!!
THE HORROR!!!!
THE PHOTOGRAPHER SHOULD BE TRIED FOR TREASON!!!!1
Dan
Talk about "deny/deflect/deceive"...what the NYT did to Rummy is
outrageous and unprecedented. That you cannot even make that
admission by now, and even try to change the subject, demonstrates
your inability to defend your own politics. I've noticed this trend
with the resident liberals here for years now. Constantly.
My theory isn't so much that you, the Democrats, are stupid, though
that often is a factor, but that you just aren't going to let the only
people you truly hate (that is, those who beat you in elections and
implement policies that prove you are wrong) get the better of you.
This hatred drives you to do things like make the terrorists job
easier and other forms of intimidation no matter what level of
dishonesty you must stoop to.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More well-intentioned reporting from the NYT.
- From: Unclaimed Mysteries
- Re: More well-intentioned reporting from the NYT.
- From: Dan Bretta
- Re: More well-intentioned reporting from the NYT.
- From: dave reid
- Re: More well-intentioned reporting from the NYT.
- References:
- More well-intentioned reporting from the NYT.
- From: The Grand Beckoning
- Re: More well-intentioned reporting from the NYT.
- From: Dave Reid
- Re: More well-intentioned reporting from the NYT.
- From: The Grand Beckoning
- Re: More well-intentioned reporting from the NYT.
- From: Spaceman Spiff
- Re: More well-intentioned reporting from the NYT.
- From: The Grand Beckoning
- Re: More well-intentioned reporting from the NYT.
- From: Dan Bretta
- More well-intentioned reporting from the NYT.
- Prev by Date: Re: The terrorist already knew we were tracking their money
- Next by Date: Re: Did you get your copy of the retraction?
- Previous by thread: Re: More well-intentioned reporting from the NYT.
- Next by thread: Re: More well-intentioned reporting from the NYT.
- Index(es):