Re: DeLay's redistricting (mostly) upheld
- From: "Tom Enright" <freddy_hayek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jun 2006 11:37:46 -0700
rich hammett wrote:
The only objection I ever had to it (aside from minority
voting rights) was the fact that they did it out of
order. There was a process in place and they blew it
away. That's a recipe for even more chaos. Although I
dunno, more chaos in Tejas might be a good thing.
I can go with the second part of your poast, but, AFAIK,
there wasn't any effect on "minority voting rights."
-Tom Enright
rich
--
-to reply, it's hot not warm
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
\ Rich Hammett http://home.hiwaay.net/~rhammett
/ The Bill Clinton of RSFC
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DeLay's redistricting (mostly) upheld
- From: rich hammett
- Re: DeLay's redistricting (mostly) upheld
- From: Steve Cutchen
- Re: DeLay's redistricting (mostly) upheld
- References:
- DeLay's redistricting (mostly) upheld
- From: xyzzy
- Re: DeLay's redistricting (mostly) upheld
- From: rich hammett
- DeLay's redistricting (mostly) upheld
- Prev by Date: Re: DeLay's redistricting (mostly) upheld
- Next by Date: Re: What I hate about big $ college athletics
- Previous by thread: Re: DeLay's redistricting (mostly) upheld
- Next by thread: Re: DeLay's redistricting (mostly) upheld
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|