Re: Unbelieveable

Quiet, rjones@xxxxxxxxx -- I'm transmitting rage.


James Schrumpf wrote:
Quiet, rjones@xxxxxxxxx -- I'm transmitting rage.


James Schrumpf wrote:
Quiet, rjones@xxxxxxxxx -- I'm transmitting rage.


Tom Enright wrote:
James Schrumpf wrote:

Quiet, rich hammett <bubbarichau@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -- I'm
transmitting rage.

Minä suojelen sinua kaikelta, mitä ikinä keksitkin sanoa,
Ja
mes
Schrumpf:

I think they fell "down", as opposed to "over"... but it's
been a long time since I've seen it because the leftist
MSM TV media won't show the videos anymore because they
don't want us to be angry at the people who did it.

Yeah, that's why they're not showing them. Idot.

rich

Why do you think they don't show them any more?

Ask Micheal Moore. For some reason showing Americans
as victims of terrorist attacks is verbotten. Showing
Americans and non-Americans as victims of the Bush war machine,
now that's kosher.

I know you guys are busy enjoying your persecution complex, but
it seems to have blinded you to the fact that the MS TV media
don't show *any* kind of victims.

And if the WTC videos were showing repeatedly, you guys would be
accusing the liberal media of trying to demoralize the country.



Hardly. In 1942 there were already several movies out that
covered the attack on Pearl Harbor; do you suppose many people
found those "demoralizing"?

I thought you were talking about showing videos of the actual
events. In any case, there have already been at least a TV movie
and a cinematic feature on the events of 9/11, to my knowledge. I
also strongly suspect that your assertion about there being movies
that covered Pearl Harbor already in 1942 is somewhat less than
accurate. Can you give examples? Were 3-week production times
typical in 1942?

"Remember Pearl Harbor", 1942, http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0035249/
"Submarine Raider", 1942, http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0035391/

I thought there were more on IMDB, but that's what I found for 1942.
Maybe not "several", but at least "some."

There were a couple of Japanese versions, but I figured they didn't
count.



But anyway, I think I saw the photos from Abu Greib for a couple
years longer than the 9/11 videos were on. What were you saying
about "not showing victims"?

I've seen pictures of 9/11 events more often than I've seen
pictures from Abu Ghraib. Perhaps there's some self-selection
going on here. In any event, there's certainly not enough of a
disparity to justify your victim complex.

It'd be interesting to get a real Nexus-Lexus (or whatever that
journalism database is called) count to see what the numbers really
are.

Still, it seems that the Abu Greib pictures get pulled out a lot to
show American "atrocities," but mention 9/11 anymore and one is
"exploiting" it.

I honestly believe that if the media started repeating clips of people
jumping out of the WTC, more right-wingers would complete about it
that left-wingers would. Why doesn't the MSM show any pictures of
dead or wounded american soldiers? Is that also part of the
conspiracy? Which side would comlain more if they did?



When I said the MSM doesn't show victims, I was primarily thinking
of pictures of violent deaths, which is what I originally thought
you were talking about.



People leaping from skyscrapers is pretty violent.

That's exactly what I mean. I'm saying the media doesn't show the WTC
pictures because they are violent. Not because of a vast left-wing
conspiracy. They don't show pictures of dead american soldiers or
iraqi insurgents or civilians either.


There are many photos of 911 that don't involve bodies falling from the
sky. Think back.. when's the last time you remember seeing a photo of a
plane going into one of those buildings? Now, when's the last time you
saw an Abu Greib photo? How far apart in time were those events in real
time?

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
James Schrumpf http://www.hilltopper.net

We Must Protect this Couch!
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Unbelieveable
    ... TV media won't show the videos anymore because they don't ... For some reason showing Americans ... as victims of terrorist attacks is verbotten. ... I've seen pictures of 9/11 events more often than I've seen pictures ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: Unbelieveable
    ... TV media won't show the videos anymore because they don't ... For some reason showing Americans ... as victims of terrorist attacks is verbotten. ... I've seen pictures of 9/11 events more often than I've seen pictures ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: Toxic waste creates hermaphrodite Arctic polar bears
    ... > Alan wrote: ... >> changing polar bears like this, would it also explain why American men are ... Stathis had Allen ship him the memory card that was in her camera. ... On the card were a number of pictures - including holiday snapshots, ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: OFF TOPIC -Hanoi Jane anti-war bus tour
    ... I have no idea of the factuality of this excerpt, but from the pictures published, it seems accurate. ... But even worse than her "War Crimes" museum tour, Fonda's most notorious visit was to the site of a Communist antiaircraft gun, which was used to blast American pilots and their planes out of the sky. ... Even many of Fonda's supporters were shocked and disgusted to see the helmeted Fonda smiling, clapping, shaking hands and otherwise fraternizing with the weapon's crew. ...
    (sci.med.transcription)
  • Re: More American media playing with history
    ... bothered I could probably list at least 20 films that give Americans ... I bet almost every American thinks that's true. ... Director at the Honeysuckle Creek Tracking Station at the time. ... Apparently the pictures where first shown on a screen with a TV camera aimed ...
    (soc.culture.scottish)