Re: Elementary logic

Charles Beauchamp wrote:
PrinceGunter wrote:

I still haven't received an answer, or been led to believe that
elementary logic can disprove that Bush lied.



You have received the answer probably more then 1,000 times over the past 3 1/2 years. Like all liberals and Bush-bashers you do not like the policy so you ignore the answer. Your subject line is rather misleading.


To recap, Bush made the decision to invade Iraq two weeks previous to
the release of Hans Blix's report. This can be explained in one of
three ways (below). Which explanation are you guys going with?



Actually the explanation is simple enough. The "inspection" that Blix was undertaking was in now way different from numerous bogus inspections the previous decade over.

I didn't know that "bogus" meant "correct".

Your explanation ignores the fact, of course, that Blix was correct and you and your reindeer were wrong.

(How wrong was he?!)

Let me count the ways ...

>
>
>
[material that is either epithets or selective memory deleted]
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Whats wrong with these pictures???
    ... This shows that you do NOT understand how science works. ... Each explanation having some additional complexity added to it. ... Science is ALWAYS trying to DISPROVE the currently accepted explanation. ... Scientists of today have an agenda ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Whats wrong with these pictures???
    ... This shows that you do NOT understand how science works. ... Each explanation having some additional complexity added to it. ... Science is ALWAYS trying to DISPROVE the currently accepted explanation. ... simplest theory fails to explain but that your theory succeeds at ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The velocity of light going pass a moving train.
    ... Does it not disprove LET? ... Sitter's explanation, but ... are some experiments that refute length contraction, they may only be in a ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)