Re: Fascinating DB Problem
- From: "FrisbeeŽ" <billLASTNAME@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:46:19 -0500
"Jeff Davis" <jd_home@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:a4dec$43d64901$80a32844$29741@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> lee-dont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> Jeff Davis <jd_home@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>A query to a db returns a recordset. The first time the recordset is
>>>inspected SOME of the fields' data values are present. SOME aren't. I
>>>look at the table in the db monitor and ALL the fields have values. I
>>>insert a trace loop into the code. The trace loop reports ALL the fields
>>>have values. I remove the trace loop. The problem recurs. I change the
>>>trace loop to an assignment statement which I ignore. The problem is
>>>solved.
>>>
>>>What #1 Son refers to as a Heidegger's Cat Problem.
>>
>>
>> Which high-quality, industrial strength database product does exhibits
>> this sort of behaviour?
>>
>
> I'd rather not say. The company that produces it can grind me to bits.
Safe to say it's not Pervasive, then.
.
- References:
- Fascinating DB Problem
- From: Jeff Davis
- Re: Fascinating DB Problem
- From: lee-dont
- Re: Fascinating DB Problem
- From: Jeff Davis
- Fascinating DB Problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Best Mark Knopfler Songs
- Next by Date: Re: Nearly as scary as losing control of a car on the freeway...
- Previous by thread: Re: Fascinating DB Problem
- Next by thread: Re: Fascinating DB Problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
