Re: Daniel Ratings, Oct 1
- From: mianderson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 2 Oct 2005 10:41:11 -0700
Bill Lang wrote:
>
> Besause you don't have a clue what his algorithm is.
Well I know it's one that doesn't make a lot of sense in terms of
relevant performance. He can create an algorithm that ranks teams
based on shoe size or which players have the hawtest girlfriends.
Doesn't make it any less silly. Any program that ranks Minnesota and
Texas virtually identical to each other isn't a good one.
The rest of
> us do, and know why his rankings look the way they do.
>
> Visit Carl's page, study his rankings. It's interesting when you
> take it for what it's meant to be.
well ok.....what is it 'meant to be'?
>
> --
> mutt
>
> "Gentlemen! You can't fight in here. This is the War Room!"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Daniel Ratings, Oct 1
- From: Daniel Williams
- Re: Daniel Ratings, Oct 1
- References:
- Re: Daniel Ratings, Oct 1
- From: mianderson
- Re: Daniel Ratings, Oct 1
- From: Bill Lang
- Re: Daniel Ratings, Oct 1
- Prev by Date: Re: Reasons for WVU fans to be happy, from the scouts.com board
- Next by Date: Ty Willingham vs Charlie Weis
- Previous by thread: Re: Daniel Ratings, Oct 1
- Next by thread: Re: Daniel Ratings, Oct 1
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|